Cited by 59Osteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsHip disorders and treatmentsBone and Joint Diseases

Imaging of osteoarthritis—recent research developments and future perspective

Open access
Hayashi, Daichi, Roemer, Frank W, Guermazi, Ali·2018·The British Journal of Radiology

Abstract

In osteoarthritis research, imaging plays an important role in clinical trials and epidemiological observational studies. In this narrative review article, we will describe recent developments in imaging of osteoarthritis in the research arena, mainly focusing on literature evidence published within the past 3 years (2014-2017). We will primarily focus on MRI including advanced imaging techniques that are not currently commonly used in routine clinical practice, although radiography, ultrasound and nuclear medicine (radiotracer) imaging will also be discussed. Research efforts to uncover the disease process of OA as well as to discover a disease modifying OA drug continue. MRI continues to play a large role in these endeavors, while compositional MRI techniques will increasingly become important due to their ability to assess "premorphologic" biochemical changes of articular cartilage and other tissues in and around joints. Radiography remain the primary imaging modality for defining inclusion/exclusion criteria as well as an outcome measure in OA clinical trials, despite known limitations for visualization of OA features. Compositional MRI techniques show promise for predicting structural and clinical outcomes in OA research. Ultrasound can be a useful adjunct to radiography and MRI particularly for evaluation of hand OA. Newer imaging techniques such as hybrid PET/MRI may have a potential but require further research and validation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1259/bjr.20170349

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advances in miniaturized ultrasonography and low-field MRI systems have enabled robust detection of joint effusion, synovial thickening, and osteophytes.

    “Although subtle cartilage lesions may still be a challenge, advances in miniaturized ultrasonicography (using 5–15 MHz broadband transducers, 20–30 Hz frame rates, synthetic aperture techniques, and wireless connectivity) and emerging low-field MRI systems (0.1–0.5 Tesla) equipped with permanent magnets, optimized pulse sequences, and AI-enhanced reconstruction have enabled surprisingly robust det”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayashi, D., Roemer, F. W., & Guermazi, A.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Hayashi, Daichi
Venue
The British Journal of Radiology
Published
2018-01-19
Volume
91
Issue
1085
Pages
20170349-20170349
ISSN
  • 0007-1285 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-880X
OpenAlex
W2779629767
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone and Joint Diseases
Keywords
osteoarthritis, osteoarthritis imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, articular cartilage, radiography, musculoskeletal ultrasound, hand osteoarthritis, PET/MRI, radiotracer imaging, disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs, clinical trial outcome measures
MeSH terms
Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Osteoarthritis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review