Distribution of cranial MRI abnormalities in patients with symptomatic and subclinical CADASIL
Open accessAbstract
Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is a rare, inherited cause of early stroke and dementia, with a poor prognosis. This study was performed to clarify lesion appearance and pattern of lesion distribution in CADASIL. 20 members of a single family were tested for the CADASIL gene mutation and studied with cranial MRI. Scans were evaluated for lesion load and pattern of lesion distribution. 19 patients had cranial MRI, of whom 11 had normal MRI scans, were clinically unaffected and tested negative for the CADASIL gene mutation. The remaining eight patients had abnormal cranial MRI scans: seven patients were positive for the CADASIL gene mutation and one (untested) patient was severely clinically affected. Three of the patients who tested positive for the CADASIL gene mutation were clinically unaffected at the time of imaging. All eight patients with abnormal cranial MRI had subcortical white matter abnormalities, mostly in frontal and temporal lobes. Lesions involving the corpus callosum were present on sagittal T2 weighted images in four of five clinically affected and one of three clinically unaffected patients. Lesions involving the deep grey nuclei and the brain stem were common. On T1 weighted images, lesions were either poorly defined (confluent white matter hypointensity) or well defined (cystic infarcts or enlarged perivascular spaces). Atrophy was infrequent. Familiarity with the range of cranial MRI appearances may aid diagnosis of CADASIL. Recognition of cranial imaging features in asymptomatic CADASIL patients could prompt earlier diagnosis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A study of members of a single family carrying a CADASIL mutation concluded that atrophy was rather rare.
“In contrast, a previous study on members of a single family carrying a CADASIL mutation concluded that atrophy was rather rare [12].”
From Clinical and research applications of magnetic resonance imaging in the study of CADASIL (2019) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Coulthard, A., Blank, S. C., Bushby, K., Kalaria, R. N., & Burn, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Royal Victoria Infirmary (GB)
- Venue
- The British Journal of Radiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-03-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 867
- Pages
- 256-265
- ISSN
- 0007-1285 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-880X
- OpenAlex
- W2154908278
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Neurological Complications and Syndromes
- Keywords
- CADASIL, lesion distribution, corpus callosum lesions, brainstem lesions, perivascular spaces, early diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Family, Genetic Testing, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Dementia, Multi-Infarct
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review