The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pathological complete response following pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: analysis of phase II/III trials
Abstract
Pathological complete response (pCR) has been used as a marker for the efficacy of pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) schedules in rectal cancer. To date there have been no randomized trials comparing CRT regimens in rectal cancer. Prospective phase II and CRT arms of randomized trials reported up to January 2004 were included, providing they defined the following minimum variables: drugs employed during CRT, radiotherapy dose and pCR rate. Multivariate analysis was used to examine the relationship of these variables on the pCR rate. In addition, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the type of publication (peer reviewed vs meeting abstract) and whether the tumours were stated to be unresectable/clinically fixed or to have threatened circumferential margins were investigated. The method of analysis was weighted linear modelling of the pCR rate which was normalized by the arcsine transformation. Phase II and phase III trials were identified including a total of 3157 patients. On multivariate analysis only the use of continuous infusion 5FU (p = 0.01), the use of a second drug (p = 0.001) and radiation dose (p = 0.02) were associated with higher rates of pCR. The use of a two drug regimen, the mode of delivery of 5FU and the radiation dose appear to be related to the incidence of pCR following CRT for rectal cancer. These results may generate hypotheses for future randomized trials. Important factors not considered in this analysis include the variability in pathological examination and in the time interval between CRT and surgery. In addition, the toxicity of the CRT regimens requires further investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gérard, J.-P., Azria, D., Gourgou-Bourgade, S., Martel-Laffay, I., Hennequin, C., Etienne, P.-L., Vendrely, V., François, E., de La Roche, G., Bouché, O., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.25.8376 · Cited by 747
Capirci, C., Valentini, V., Cionini, L., De Paoli, A., Rodel, C., Glynne-Jones, R., Coco, C., Romano, M., Mantello, G., Palazzi, S., et al. (2008) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.12.019 · Cited by 445
Glynne-Jones, R., & Hughes, R. (2012) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.8732 · Cited by 256
Alternative clinical end points in rectal cancer—are we getting closer?
Glynne-Jones, R., Mawdsley, S., Pearce, T., & Buyse, M. (2006) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl173 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Hartley, A., Ho, K. F., McConkey, C., & Geh, J. I.
- Venue
- The British Journal of Radiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 934
- Pages
- 934-938
- ISSN
- 0007-1285 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-880X
- OpenAlex
- W2071971830
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathological complete response following pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: analysis of phase II/III trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1259/bjr/86650067
- The paper
- Hartley, A., Ho, K. F., McConkey, C., & Geh, J. I. (2005). Pathological complete response following pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: analysis of phase II/III trials. The British Journal of Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/86650067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.