Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 487

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tooth detection and numbering in panoramic radiographs using convolutional neural networks

Open access
Tuzoff, Dmitry V., Tuzova, Lyudmila N., Bornstein, Michael M., Krasnov, Alexey S., Kharchenko, Max A., Nikolenko, Sergey I., Sveshnikov, Mikhail M., Bednenko, Georgiy B.·2019·Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Analysis of dental radiographs is an important part of the diagnostic process in daily clinical practice. Interpretation by an expert includes teeth detection and numbering. In this project, a novel solution based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is proposed that performs this task automatically for panoramic radiographs. METHODS: A data set of 1352 randomly chosen panoramic radiographs of adults was used to train the system. The CNN-based architectures for both teeth detection and numbering tasks were analyzed. The teeth detection module processes the radiograph to define the boundaries of each tooth. It is based on the state-of-the-art Faster R-CNN architecture. The teeth numbering module classifies detected teeth images according to the FDI notation. It utilizes the classical VGG-16 CNN together with the heuristic algorithm to improve results according to the rules for spatial arrangement of teeth. A separate testing set of 222 images was used to evaluate the performance of the system and to compare it to the expert level. RESULTS: For the teeth detection task, the system achieves the following performance metrics: a sensitivity of 0.9941 and a precision of 0.9945. For teeth numbering, its sensitivity is 0.9800 and specificity is 0.9994. Experts detect teeth with a sensitivity of 0.9980 and a precision of 0.9998. Their sensitivity for tooth numbering is 0.9893 and specificity is 0.9997. The detailed error analysis showed that the developed software system makes errors caused by similar factors as those for experts. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the proposed computer-aided diagnosis solution is comparable to the level of experts. Based on these findings, the method has the potential for practical application and further evaluation for automated dental radiograph analysis. Computer-aided teeth detection and numbering simplifies the process of filling out digital dental charts. Automation could help to save time and improve the completeness of electronic dental records.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1259/dmfr.20180051

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 487

Metadata

Authors
Tuzoff, D. V., Tuzova, L. N., Bornstein, M. M., Krasnov, A. S., Kharchenko, M. A., Nikolenko, S. I., Sveshnikov, M. M., & Bednenko, G. B.
Venue
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
Published
2019-05
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
20180051
ISSN
  • 0250-832X (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-542X
OpenAlex
W2918471352
Cited by
487
References
8
FWCI
46.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tooth detection and numbering in panoramic radiographs using convolutional neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1259/dmfr.20180051
The paper
Tuzoff, D. V., Tuzova, L. N., Bornstein, M. M., Krasnov, A. S., Kharchenko, M. A., Nikolenko, S. I., Sveshnikov, M. M., & Bednenko, G. B. (2019). Tooth detection and numbering in panoramic radiographs using convolutional neural networks. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180051

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.