The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artefacts in CBCT: a review
Open accessAbstract
Artefacts are common in today's cone beam CT (CBCT). They are induced by discrepancies between the mathematical modelling and the actual physical imaging process. Since artefacts may interfere with the diagnostic process performed on CBCT data sets, every user should be aware of their presence. This article aims to discuss the most prominent artefacts identified in the scientific literature and review the existing knowledge on these artefacts. We also briefly review the basic three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction concept applied by today's CBCT scanners, as all artefacts are more or less directly related to it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging
Kak, A. C., & Slaney, M. (2001) · doi:10.1137/1.9780898719277 · Cited by 5,809
Cited by
Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy
Lim-Reinders, S., Keller, B. M., Al-Ward, S., Sahgal, A., & Kim, A. (2017) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.04.023 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Schulze, R., Heil, U., Groβ, D., Bruellmann, D., Dranischnikow, E., Schwanecke, U., & Schoemer, E.
- Venue
- Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 265-273
- ISSN
- 0250-832X (ISSN-L)
- 1476-542X
- OpenAlex
- W2166018620
- Cited by
- 999
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artefacts in CBCT: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1259/dmfr/30642039
- The paper
- Schulze, R., Heil, U., Groβ, D., Bruellmann, D., Dranischnikow, E., Schwanecke, U., & Schoemer, E. (2011). Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/30642039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
