Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thirst for Drink Knowledge: How Singaporean Youth Athletes Measure up in an Exercise Hydration Knowledge Questionnaire

Chia, Michael, Mukherjee, Swarup, Huang, Dynelle·2015·International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

Abstract

The study examined the exercise hydration knowledge of youth athletes in Singaporean schools. 586 youth athletes (mean age 13.9±2.5yrs, male=322, female=259, unidentified=5) from four primary schools (n=231, 11.4±1.1yrs), four secondary schools (n=219, 14.5±1.1yrs) and one junior college (n=136, 17.3±0.8yrs), participated in the study. All participants completed a validated exercise hydration knowledge questionnaire that was developed based upon the consensus statements and position stands of three international sport associations. 46.9% of youths were dependent on teachers and coaches for exercise hydration knowledge, but junior college students were more self-taught. An average knowledge competence score of 44.7±14.0% was obtained, which was significantly below the minimum required competence score of 80%. Post-exercise hydration knowledge was significantly lower than pre-and during exercise hydration knowledge (Mean scores pre=47.2±22.0%, during=48.7±16.9%, post=36.3±18.3%; all p<0.05). Overall, exercise hydration knowledge gaps among youth athletes were identified, in particular for post-exercise hydration. The majority of participants from the three schooling levels did not attain the required competence score of 80% and above. Coach education and physical education training programmes must specifically address and ameliorate these knowledge deficiencies among Singaporean youth so that they can be empowered to take personal responsibility for their safe participation and training in sport.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1260/1747-9541.10.5.841

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31802fa199 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Casa D.J., 2000, Journal of Athletic Training, 35, 212
  3. Somboonwong J., 2012, British Medical Journal Open, 2, e000741
  4. 10.1016/j.scispo.2011.10.009 · DOI
  5. 10.1123/ijsnem.15.5.515 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ransone J., 1999, Journal of Athletic Training, 34, 267
  7. American Red Cross, 1988, Sports Injury: Emergency First Aid Care and Prevention
  8. 10.1123/ijspp.3.3.262 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.4085/1062-6050-47.2.205 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Trammell J.E., 2007, Master Thesis
  11. Chapman P., 1997, Adolescence, 32, 437
  12. 10.1123/ijsn.8.1.36 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Chia, M., Mukherjee, S., & Huang, D.
Affiliations
Physical Education and Sports Science Academic Group, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk, Singapore 637616
Venue
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2015-10
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
841-850
ISSN
  • 1747-9541
  • 2048-397X
Cited by
3
References
1
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.