Cited by 35RNA Research and SplicingNuclear Structure and FunctionRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Mutations of EXOSC3/Rrp40p associated with neurological diseases impact ribosomal RNA processing functions of the exosome in S. cerevisiae

Open access
Gillespie, Abby, Gabunilas, Jason, Jen, Joanna C., Chanfreau, Guillaume F.·2017·RNA

Abstract

The RNA exosome is a conserved multiprotein complex that achieves a large number of processive and degradative functions in eukaryotic cells. Recently, mutations have been mapped to the gene encoding one of the subunits of the exosome, EXOSC3 (yeast Rrp40p), which results in pontocerebellar hypoplasia with motor neuron degeneration in human patients. However, the molecular impact of these mutations in the pathology of these diseases is not well understood. To investigate the molecular consequences of mutations in EXOSC3 that lead to neurological diseases, we analyzed the effect of three of the mutations that affect conserved residues of EXOSC3/Rrp40p (G31A, G191C, and W238R; G8A, G148C, and W195R, respectively, in human and yeast) in S. cerevisiae . We show that the severity of the phenotypes of these mutations in yeast correlate with that of the disease in human patients, with the W195R mutant showing the strongest growth and RNA processing phenotypes. Furthermore, we show that these mutations affect more severely pre-ribosomal RNA processing functions of the exosome rather than other nuclear processing or surveillance functions. These results suggest that delayed or defective pre-rRNA processing might be the primary defect responsible for the pathologies detected in patients with mutations affecting EXOSC3 function in residues conserved throughout eukaryotes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1261/rna.060004.116

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The RNA exosome plays central roles in ribosomal RNA processing (rRNA) and defects in rRNA processing have been identified in yeast and fly models expressing EXOSC3 variants.

    “The RNA exosome also plays central roles in ribosomal RNA processing (rRNA) and defects in rRNA processing have been identified in yeast and fly models expressing EXOSC3 variants15,48.”

    From EXOSC3 G191 Variants Trigger System-Wide Recalibration of RNA Processing Machinery (2026) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Introduction identifies pre-rRNA processing as a major exosome function, and the Abstract reports defective pre-rRNA processing in yeast expressing EXOSC3/Rrp40p variants. This paper does not report an EXOSC3-variant fly model, so it supports the yeast portion but not the fly portion of the cited sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Allmang C, Kufel J, Chanfreau G, Mitchell P, Petfalski E, Tollervey D. 1999a Functions of the exosome in rRNA, snoRNA and snRNA synthesis. EMBO J 18: 5399– 5410. 10508172 PMC1171609
  2. Allmang C, Petfalski E, Podtelejnikov A, Mann M, Tollervey D, Mitchell P. 1999b The yeast exosome and human PM-Scl are related complexes of 3′→5′ exonucleases. Genes Dev 13: 2148– 2158. 10465791 PMC316947
  3. Allmang C, Mitchell P, Petfalski E, Tollervey D. 2000 Degradation of ribosomal RNA precursors by the exosome. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 1684– 1691. 10734186 PMC102825
  4. Bousquet-Antonelli C, Presutti C, Tollervey D. 2000 Identification of a regulated pathway for nuclear pre-mRNA turnover. Cell 102: 765– 775. 11030620
  5. Egecioglu DE, Henras AK, Chanfreau GF. 2006 Contributions of Trf4p- and Trf5p-dependent polyadenylation to the processing and degradative functions of the yeast nuclear exosome. RNA 12: 26– 32. 16373491 PMC1370882
  6. Eggens VR, Barth PG, Niermeijer J-MF, Berg JN, Darin N, Dixit A, Fluss J, Foulds N, Fowler D, Hortobágyi T, 2014 EXOSC3 mutations in pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 1: novel mutations and genotype-phenotype correlations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 9: 23. 24524299 PMC3928094
  7. Fasken MB, Losh JS, Leung SW, Brutus S, Avin B, Vaught JC, Potter-Birriel J, Craig T, Tsanova B, Conn GL, 2016 Insight into the RNA exosome complex through modeling pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 1b disease mutations in yeast. Genetics 12: 26– 32. PMC5223504 27777260
  8. Gabunilas J, Chanfreau G. 2016 Splicing-mediated autoregulation modulates Rpl22p expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 12: e1005999. 27097027 PMC4838235
  9. Halevy A, Lerer I, Cohen R, Kornreich L, Shuper A, Gamliel M, El Zimerman B, Korabi I, Meiner V, Straussberg R, 2014 Novel EXOSC3 mutation causes complicated hereditary spastic paraplegia. J Neurol 261: 2165– 2169. 25149867
  10. Haruki H, Nishikawa J, Laemmli UK. 2008 The anchor-away technique: rapid, conditional establishment of yeast mutant phenotypes. Mol Cell 31: 925– 932. 18922474
  11. Kadaba S, Krueger A, Trice T, Krecic AM, Hinnebusch AG, Anderson J. 2004 Nuclear surveillance and degradation of hypomodified initiator tRNAMet in S. cerevisiae. Genes Dev 18: 1227– 1240. 15145828 PMC420349
  12. Lebreton A, Tomecki R, Dziembowski A, Séraphin B. 2008 Endonucleolytic RNA cleavage by a eukaryotic exosome. Nature 456: 993– 996. 19060886
  13. Lubas M, Andersen PR, Schein A, Dziembowski A, Kudla G, Jensen TH. 2015 The human nuclear exosome targeting complex is loaded onto newly synthesized RNA to direct early ribonucleolysis. Cell Rep 10: 178– 192. 25578728
  14. Makino DL, Baumgärtner M, Conti E. 2013 Crystal structure of an RNA-bound 11-subunit eukaryotic exosome complex. Nature 495: 70– 75. 23376952
  15. Makino DL, Schuch B, Stegmann E, Baumgärtner M, Basquin C, Conti E. 2015 RNA degradation paths in a 12-subunit nuclear exosome complex. Nature 524: 54– 58. 26222026
  16. Mitchell P, Petfalski E, Shevchenko A, Mann M, Tollervey D. 1997 The exosome: a conserved eukaryotic RNA processing complex containing multiple 3′→5′ exoribonucleases. Cell 91: 457– 466. 9390555
  17. Pefanis E, Wang J, Rothschild G, Lim J, Kazadi D, Sun J, Federation A, Chao J, Elliott O, Liu Z-P, 2015 RNA exosome-regulated long non-coding RNA transcription controls super-enhancer activity. Cell 161: 774– 789. 25957685 PMC4428671
  18. Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Senderek J, Jen JC, Houge G, Seeman P, Puchmajerová A, Graul-Neumann L, Seidel U, Korinthenberg R, Kirschner J, 2013 Pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 1: clinical spectrum and relevance of EXOSC3 mutations. Neurology 80: 438– 446. 23284067 PMC3590055
  19. Ryan OW, Skerker JM, Maurer MJ, Li X, Tsai JC, Poddar S, Lee ME, DeLoache W, Dueber JE, Arkin AP, 2014 Selection of chromosomal DNA libraries using a multiplex CRISPR system. Elife 3: e03703. PMC4161972 25139909
  20. Sayani S, Chanfreau GF. 2012 Sequential RNA degradation pathways provide a fail-safe mechanism to limit the accumulation of unspliced transcripts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 18: 1563– 1572. 22753783 PMC3404376
  21. Schaeffer D, Tsanova B, Barbas A, Reis FP, Dastidar EG, Sanchez-Rotunno M, Arraiano CM, van Hoof A. 2009 The exosome contains domains with specific endoribonuclease, exoribonuclease and cytoplasmic mRNA decay activities. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16: 56– 62. 19060898 PMC2615074
  22. Schneider C, Leung E, Brown J, Tollervey D. 2009 The N-terminal PIN domain of the exosome subunit Rrp44 harbors endonuclease activity and tethers Rrp44 to the yeast core exosome. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 1127– 1140. 19129231 PMC2651783
  23. Schwabova J, Brozkova DS, Petrak B, Mojzisova M, Pavlickova K, Haberlova J, Mrazkova L, Hedvicakova P, Hornofova L, Kaluzova M, 2013 Homozygous EXOSC3 mutation c.92G→C, p.G31A is a founder mutation causing severe pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 1 among the Czech Roma. J Neurogenet 27: 163– 169. 23883322
  24. Stovicek V, Borodina I, Forster J. 2015 CRISPR-Cas system enables fast and simple genome editing of industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Metab Eng Commun 2: 13– 22. PMC8193243 34150504
  25. van Hoof A, Lennertz P, Parker R. 2000 Yeast exosome mutants accumulate 3′-extended polyadenylated forms of U4 small nuclear RNA and small nucleolar RNAs. Mol Cell Biol 20: 441– 452. 10611222 PMC85098
  26. van Hoof A, Frischmeyer PA, Dietz HC, Parker R. 2002 Exosome-mediated recognition and degradation of mRNAs lacking a termination codon. Science 295: 2262– 2264. 11910110
  27. Wan J, Yourshaw M, Mamsa H, Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Menezes MP, Hong JE, Leong DW, Senderek J, Salman MS, Chitayat D, 2012 Mutations in the RNA exosome component gene EXOSC3 cause pontocerebellar hypoplasia and spinal motor neuron degeneration. Nat Genet 44: 704– 708. 22544365 PMC3366034
  28. Wasmuth EV, Januszyk K, Lima CD. 2014 Structure of an Rrp6–RNA exosome complex bound to poly(A) RNA. Nature 511: 435– 439. 25043052 PMC4310248
  29. Wery M, Ruidant S, Schillewaert S, Leporé N, Lafontaine DLJ. 2009 The nuclear poly(A) polymerase and exosome cofactor Trf5 is recruited cotranscriptionally to nucleolar surveillance. RNA 15: 406– 419. 19141608 PMC2657017
  30. Wyers F, Rougemaille M, Badis G, Rousselle JC, Dufour ME, Boulay J, Regnault B, Devaux F, Namane A, Seraphin B, 2005 Cryptic pol II transcripts are degraded by a nuclear quality control pathway involving a new poly(A) polymerase. Cell 121: 725– 737. 15935759
  31. Zinder JC, Wasmuth EV, Lima CD. 2016 Nuclear RNA exosome at 3.1 Å reveals substrate specificities, RNA paths, and allosteric inhibition of Rrp44/Dis3. Mol Cell 64: 734– 745. 27818140 PMC5115963

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gillespie, A., Gabunilas, J., Jen, J. C., & Chanfreau, G. F.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
RNA
Published
2017-01-04
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
466-472
ISSN
  • 1355-8382 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9001
OpenAlex
W2568408493
Cited by
35
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • RNA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM61518, T32GM007185)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
EXOSC3, RNA exosome, pontocerebellar hypoplasia, motor neuron degeneration, pre-rRNA processing, ribosome biogenesis, conserved residues, yeast model
MeSH terms
Protein Conformation, alpha-Helical, Protein Conformation, beta-Strand, Amino Acid Sequence, Binding Sites, Humans, Mutation, Olivopontocerebellar Atrophies, Protein Binding, RNA Precursors, RNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional, RNA, Fungal, RNA, Ribosomal, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Sequence Alignment, RNA-Binding Proteins, Conserved Sequence, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Amino Acid Substitution, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs, Exosome Multienzyme Ribonuclease Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review