Dynamic isomiR regulation in Drosophila development
Abstract
Several recent reports have demonstrated that microRNAs (miRNAs) can exhibit heterogeneous ends and post-transcriptional nontemplate 3′ end additions of uridines or adenosines. Using two small RNA deep-sequencing data sets, we show here that these miRNA isoforms (isomiRs) are differentially expressed across Drosophila melanogaster development and tissues. Specifically, we demonstrate that: (1) nontemplate nucleotide additions of adenosines to miRNA 3′ ends are highly abundant in early development; (2) a subset of miRNAs with nontemplate 3′ Us are expressed in adult tissues; and (3) the size of at least eight “mature” (unmodified) miRNAs varies in a life-cycle or tissue-specific manner. These results suggest that subtle variability in isomiR expression, which is widely thought to be the result of inexact Dicer processing, is regulated and biologically meaningful. Indeed, a subset of the miRNAs enriched for 3′ adenosine additions during early embryonic development, including miR-282 and miR-312, show enrichment for target sites in developmental genes that are expressed during late embryogenesis, suggesting that nontemplate additions increase miRNA stability or strengthen miRNA:target interactions. This work suggests that isomiR expression is an important aspect of miRNA biology, which warrants further investigation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The expression of isomiRs appears to be regulated in a developmental and tissue-specific manner.
“The expression of isomiRs appears to be regulated in a developmental and tissue‐specific manner (Fernández‐Pérez, Brieño‐Enríquez, Isoler‐Alcaraz, Larriba, & del Mazo, 2017; Fernandez‐Valverde, Taft, & Mattick, 2010; Woldemariam et al., 2019; Wyman et al., 2011).”
From microRNA strand selection: Unwinding the rules (2021) · cites this paper as Fernandez‐Valverde, Taft, & Mattick, 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A Mammalian microRNA Expression Atlas Based on Small RNA Library Sequencing
Landgraf, P., Rusu, M., Sheridan, R., Sewer, A., Iovino, N., Aravin, A., Pfeffer, S., Rice, A., Kamphorst, A. O., Landthaler, M., et al. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.040 · Cited by 3,626 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Davis BN, Hata A. 2009. Regulation of microRNA biogenesis: A miRiad of mechanisms. Cell Commun Signal 7: 18. doi: 10.1186/ 1478-811X-7-18. · DOI
- Enright AJ, John B, Gaul U, Tuschl T, Sander C, Marks DS. 2003. MicroRNA targets in Drosophila. Genome Biol 5: R1. doi: 10.1186/ gb-2009-10-2-r25. · DOI
- Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg S. 2009. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 10: R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10- 3-r25. · DOI · Paper page
- Lyne R, Smith R, Rutherford K, Wakeling M, Varley A, Guillier F, Janssens H, Ji W, Mclaren P, North P, et al. 2007. FlyMine: An integrated database for Drosophila and Anopheles genomics. Genome Biol 8: R129. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-7-r129. · DOI
- Reich J, Snee MJ, Macdonald PM. 2009. miRNA-dependent trans- lational repression in the Drosophila ovary. PLoS ONE 4: e4669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004669. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MicroRNAs and their isomiRs function cooperatively to target common biological pathways
Cloonan, N., Wani, S., Xu, Q., Gu, J., Lea, K., Heater, S., Barbacioru, C., Steptoe, A. L., Martin, H. C., Nourbakhsh, E., et al. (2011) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-12-r126 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
microRNA strand selection: Unwinding the rules
Medley, J. C., Panzade, G., & Zinovyeva, A. Y. (2021) · WIREs RNA · doi:10.1002/wrna.1627 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Abe, M., Naqvi, A., Hendriks, G.-J., Feltzin, V., Zhu, Y., Grigoriev, A., & Bonini, N. M. (2014) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.226654.113 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fernandez-Valverde, S. L., Taft, R. J., & Mattick, J. S.
- Venue
- RNA
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2010-08-30
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1881-1888
- ISSN
- 1355-8382
- 1469-9001
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review