The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative analysis detects dependencies among the 5′ splice-site positions
Open accessAbstract
Human–mouse comparative genomics is an informative tool to assess sequence functionality as inferred from its conservation level. We used this approach to examine dependency among different positions of the 5′ splice site. We compiled a data set of 50,493 homologous human–mouse internal exons and analyzed the frequency of changes among different positions of homologous human–mouse 5′ splice-site pairs. We found mutual relationships between positions +4 and +5, +5 and +6, −2 and +5, and −1 and +5. We also demonstrated the association between the exonic and the intronic positions of the 5′ splice site, in which a stronger interaction of U1 snRNA and the intronic portion of the 5′ splice site compensates for weak interaction of U1 snRNA and the exonic portion of the 5′ splice site, and vice versa. By using an ex vivo system that mimics the effect of mutation in the 5′ splice site leading to familial dysautonomia, we demonstrated that U1 snRNA base-pairing with positions +6 and −1 is the only functional requirement for mRNA splicing of this 5′ splice site. Our findings indicate the importance of U1 snRNA base-pairing to the exonic portion of the 5′ splice site.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome
Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01262 · Cited by 7,187
Genome-wide bioinformatic and molecular analysis of introns in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
SPINGOLA, M., GRATE, L., HAUSSLER, D., & ARES, M. (1999) · RNA · doi:10.1017/s1355838299981682 · Cited by 316
Cited by
Splicing mutations in human genetic disorders: Examples, detection, and confirmation
Anna, A., & Monika, G. (2018) · Journal of Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s13353-018-0444-7 · Cited by 657
How did alternative splicing evolve?
Ast, G. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1451 · Cited by 555
Self-citationWard, A. J., & Cooper, T. A. (2010) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.2649 · Cited by 414
Amit, M., Donyo, M., Hollander, D., Goren, A., Kim, E., Gelfman, S., Lev-Maor, G., Burstein, D., Schwartz, S., Postolsky, B., et al. (2012) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2012.03.013 · Cited by 338
Self-citationGoren, A., Ram, O., Amit, M., Keren, H., Lev-Maor, G., Vig, I., Pupko, T., & Ast, G. (2006) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.008 · Cited by 306
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- CARMEL, I., TAL, S., VIG, I., & AST, G.
- Venue
- RNA
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2004-04-20
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 828-840
- ISSN
- 1355-8382 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9001
- OpenAlex
- W2118600301
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative analysis detects dependencies among the 5′ splice-site positions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1261/rna.5196404
- The paper
- CARMEL, I., TAL, S., VIG, I., & AST, G. (2004). Comparative analysis detects dependencies among the 5′ splice-site positions. RNA. https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.5196404
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.