Cited by 16Reproductive System and PregnancyImmune Cell Function and InteractionPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differentiation and Elimination of Uterine Natural Killer Cells in Delayed Implantation and Parturition Mice

Open access
KOKUBU, Keiji, HONDO, Eiichi, SAKAGUCHI, Noriko, SAGARA, Eiji, KISO, Yasuo·2005·Journal of Reproduction and Development

Abstract

To clarify the roles of uterine natural killer (uNK) cells in implantation and parturition, differentiation and elimination of uNK cells in the pregnant uterus was examined using artificial delayed implantation (DI) and delayed parturition (DP) mice. To prepare DI mice, pregnant mice were ovariectomized on the third day of pregnancy (D3) and treated with 2 mg progesterone daily. The same amount of progesterone was administered on D15 or D17 of normal pregnant mice at 24 h intervals until sampling to prepare DP mice. The uNK cells contained PAS-positive granules on D8 in DI mice. The uNK cells in DI mice were smaller in size, and differentiation of these cells was delayed compared to those of the control mice. From D19 to D21 in DP mice, the metrial gland was well developed and uNK cells were present. The number of uNK cell granules decreased on D21, and there were no uNK cells in the normal pregnant mice. This result suggests that differentiation of uNK cells is not directly related to implantation, but elimination of these cells is closely involved in parturition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1262/jrd.17033

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Stewart I, Peel S, 1982, J Anat, 135, 111
  2. Stewart I, Peel S, 1981, J Anat, 133, 535
  3. Peel S, Stewart I, Bulmer D, 1979, J Anat, 129, 21

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
KOKUBU, K., HONDO, E., SAKAGUCHI, N., SAGARA, E., & KISO, Y.
Affiliations
  • Yamaguchi University (JP)
  • Kyushu Dental University (JP)
Venue
Journal of Reproduction and Development
Published
2005
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
773-776
ISSN
  • 0916-8818 (ISSN-L)
  • 1348-4400
OpenAlex
W2006038795
Cited by
16
References
10
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Reproduction and Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
uterine natural killer cells, delayed implantation, delayed parturition, metrial gland, progesterone, ovariectomy, PAS-positive granules, pregnancy, implantation, childbirth
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Count, Cell Differentiation, Female, Killer Cells, Natural, Male, Metrial Gland, Mice, Inbred ICR, Embryo Implantation, Pregnancy, Uterus, Parturition, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review