Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 45Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyMental Health Treatment and AccessReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among visitors to faith healers in Saudi Arabia

Open access

Abstract

Objective: We investigated the prevalence of psychiatric disorders among visitors to Faith Healers (FHs) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We also studied the sociodemographic profiles for these visitors, in addition to their past psychiatric history, reason(s) for seeking FH help, and past and current treatment experience with FHs.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among the visitors (n=321) to a number of faith healing settings in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia using a specially designed questionnaire and validated Arabic version of The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview.Results: Most of the participants were young adults (35.1

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12669/pjms.305.5434

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 45

Metadata

Authors
Alosaimi, F. D., Alshehri, Y., Alfraih, I., Alghamdi, A., Aldahash, S., Alkhuzayem, H., & Albeeeshi, H.
Affiliations
  • King Saud University (SA)
  • Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital (SA)
  • Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SA)
Venue
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2014-08-07
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
1077-82
ISSN
  • 1681-715X (ISSN-L)
  • 1682-024X
OpenAlex
W2047654008
Cited by
45
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • King Saud University
  • Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Keywords
religious healing, mental illness, prevalence, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, psychosis, bipolar disorder, unmet mental health needs, sociodemographic factors, Riyadh

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review