Cited by 0E-Government and Public ServicesPublic Administration in Developing NationsSmart Cities and Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital Transformation of the Indonesian Public Sector: A Systematic Review of Governance, Audit, and Service Innovation

Open access

Abstract

The Indonesian government has invested heavily in digital transformation to address persistent challenges in public service delivery, financial accountability, and bureaucratic efficiency. Despite growing adoption of technologies such as artificial intelligence, big data analytics, and e-government platforms, a systemic synthesis of how these digital tools collectively reshape governance and accountability mechanisms remains lacking. This systematic literature review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. A structured search was conducted in the Scopus database for peer-reviewed, open-access, English-language journal articles published between 2016 and 2026, focusing explicitly on the Indonesian public sector. Out of 217 initially screened records, 10 studies met the eligibility criteria after title-abstract and full-text screening. Data were extracted using a standardized form, assessed for risk of bias, and synthesized thematically across the included studies. The synthesis identifies three interconnected mechanisms through which digitalization influences Indonesian public governance. First, digital technologies such as computer-assisted audit techniques, big data analytics, and artificial intelligence enhance financial fraud detection and oversight effectiveness, yet their full potential is constrained by incomplete regulatory frameworks for electronic evidence and insufficient auditor competence. Second, digital service innovations improve operational efficiency and public service quality, but these benefits are contingent upon adequate digital leadership, information technology governance, and a culture supportive of organizational change. Third, institutional reforms driven by integrated information systems strengthen transparency and accountability, while being significantly hindered by governance fragmentation, weak enforcement of interoperability standards, and persistent digital divides across regions. Successful digital transformation of the Indonesian public sector depends less on the mere acquisition of technology and more on synergistic institutional reforms, continuous human capacity building, and legal harmonization. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for policymakers and practitioners to align digital initiatives with the broader objectives of accountable, transparent, and responsive governance in developing economy contexts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12688/f1000research.188727.1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. A Alamsyah, 2025, Leveraging Generative AI for Public Service Innovation: A Path to Smart Government in Indonesia., Digital Government: Research and Practice., 6, 1-36, 10.1145/3761820 · DOI
  2. A Alvarenga, 2020, Digital transformation and knowledge management in the public sector., Sustainability., 12, 5824, 10.3390/su12145824 · DOI
  3. D Ariyanto, 2022, The Success of Information Systems and Sustainable Information Society: Measuring the Implementation of a Village Financial System., Sustainability (Switzerland)., 14, 10.3390/su14073851 · DOI
  4. W DeLone, 2003, The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update., J. Manag. Inf. Syst., 19, 9-30, 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · DOI · Paper page
  5. D Febriyanti, 2023, Information Communication Technology (ICT) on Palembang city government, Indonesia: Performance measurement for great digital governance., Cogent Social Sciences., 9, 10.1080/23311886.2023.2269710 · DOI
  6. R Kassem, 2012, The new fraud triangle model., J. Emerg. Trends Econ. Manag. Sci., 3, 191-195
  7. A Kurniyanta, 2026, Developing a model of innovation capability and digital transformation in Indonesia’s public sector: the role of leadership and IT governance., Cogent Bus. Manag., 13, 10.1080/23311975.2026.2637243 · DOI
  8. J Latuihamallo, 2024, Electronic Evidence of Anti-Money Laundering Regimes: A Comparative Study Between United Kingdom, United States and Indonesia., Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicacoes., 16, 189-220, 10.26512/lstr.v16i1.48449 · DOI
  9. J Merchan, 2025, Trust, technology and Electoral Integrity: A Comparative Analysis of., Technology., 6, 7
  10. I Mergel, 2019, Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews., Gov. Inf. Q., 36, 101385, 10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
  11. A Mustofa, 2025, The Impact of Digital Transformation on Public Services Governance: A Quality Assessment Scale Approach in Urban Municipalities., Journal of Governance and Regulation., 14, 156-165, 10.22495/jgrv14i4art15 · DOI
  12. M Page, 2021, The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews., BMJ., 372
  13. P Purnamasari, 2022, Modelling computer assisted audit techniques (CAATs) in enhancing the Indonesian public sector., F1000Res., 11, 559-522, 10.12688/f1000research.121674.2 · DOI
  14. I Putra, 2022, the Influence of Internal Audit, Risk Management, Whistleblowing System and Big Data Analytics on the Financial Crime Behavior Prevention., Cogent Economics and Finance., 10, 10.1080/23322039.2022.2148363 · DOI
  15. A Sarjito, 2026, Digital Governance Reform in Indonesia: a Comparative Analysis With Estonia., Public Administration Issues., 2026, 92-116, 10.17323/1999-5431-2026-0-5-92-116 · DOI
  16. K Siau, 2020, Artificial intelligence (AI) ethics: ethics of AI and ethical AI., J. Database Manag. (JDM)., 31, 74-87, 10.4018/JDM.2020040105 · DOI · Paper page
  17. K Sohag, 2021, Information digitalisation and local institutional agility: evidence from ASEAN countries., Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 172, 121063, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121063 · DOI
  18. S Syafhendry, 2025, Smart elections or rigged algorithms: the rise of artificial intelligence in electoral governance in Southeast Asia., Frontiers in Political Science., 7, 10.3389/fpos.2025.1672310 · DOI
  19. D Teece, 1997, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management., Strateg. Manag. J., 18, 509-533, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
  20. V Venkatesh, 2003, User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view1., MIS Q., 27, 425-478, 10.2307/30036540 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Efendi, S., Nurfaidah, W., Utami, A. P., Filan, J. O., Astuti, Y. R., Nirmala, A. C., Dasiussina, A. L., Pegan, H. P. C. K., Vebriani, N., & Arfiana, A.
Affiliations
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
  • Business Administration Yogyakarta Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281 Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • University of Brawijaya (ID)
Corresponding author
Efendi, Sulhan
Venue
F1000Research
Published
2026-08-14
Volume
15
Pages
1378
ISSN
2046-1402 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7201950274
Cited by
0
References
3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • F1000Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (public-domain)
Funders
Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration in Developing Nations
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
Keywords
digital transformation, public sector, public governance, e-government, financial statement audit, computer auditing, big data analytics, artificial intelligence, financial fraud detection, accountability, transparency, public service innovation, digital leadership, IT governance, institutional reform, interoperability standards, digital divide, digital evidence, Indonesian public sector

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review