The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Studies on Biological Effects of Ion Beams on Lethality, Molecular Nature of Mutation, Mutation Rate, and Spectrum of Mutation Phenotype for Mutation Breeding in Higher Plants
Open accessAbstract
Recently, heavy ions or ion beams have been used to generate new mutants or varieties, especially in higher plants. It has been found that ion beams show high relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of growth inhibition, lethality, and so on, but the characteristics of ion beams on mutation have not been clearly elucidated. To understand the effect of ion beams on mutation induction, mutation rates were investigated using visible known Arabidopsis mutant phenotypes, indicating that mutation frequencies induced by carbon ions were 20-fold higher than by electrons. In chrysanthemum and carnation, flower-color and flower-form mutants, which are hardly produced by gamma rays or X rays, were induced by ion beams. Novel mutants and their responsible genes, such as UV-B resistant, serrated petals and sepals, anthocyaninless, etc. were induced by ion beams. These results indicated that the characteristics of ion beams for mutation induction are high mutation frequency and broad mutation spectrum and therefore, efficient induction of novel mutants. On the other hand, PCR and sequencing analyses showed that half of all mutants induced by ion beams possessed large DNA alterations, while the rest had point-like mutations. Both mutations induced by ion beams had a common feature that deletion of several bases were predominantly induced. It is plausible that ion beams induce a limited amount of large and irreparable DNA damage, resulting in production of a null mutation that shows a new mutant phenotype.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cairns, J., Overbaugh, J., & Miller, S. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/335142a0 · Cited by 1,025
MEHNATI, P., MORIMOTO, S., YATAGAI, F., FURUSAWA, Y., KOBAYASHI, Y., WADA, S., KANAI, T., HANAOKA, F., & SASAKI, H. (2005) · Journal of Radiation Research · doi:10.1269/jrr.46.343 · Cited by 40
Cited by
Effect of Agricultural Chemicals and Organic Amendments on Biological Control Fungi
Pakdaman Sardrood, B., & Mohammadi Goltapeh, E. (2018) · Sustainable Agriculture Reviews · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94232-2_5 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- TANAKA, A., SHIKAZONO, N., & HASE, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Radiation Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 223-233
- ISSN
- 0449-3060 (ISSN-L)
- 1349-9157
- OpenAlex
- W2133473834
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.