Biological effects of space radiation on human cells: History, advances and outcomes
Open accessAbstract
Exposure to radiation is one of the main concerns for space exploration by humans. By focusing deliberately on the works performed on human cells, we endeavored to review, decade by decade, the technological developments and conceptual advances of space radiation biology. Despite considerable efforts, the cancer and the toxicity risks remain to be quantified: 1) the nature and the frequency of secondary heavy ions need to be better characterized in order to estimate their contribution to the dose and to the final biological response; 2) the diversity of radiation history of each astronaut and the impact of individual susceptibility make very difficult any epidemiological analysis for estimating hazards specifically due to space radiation exposure. 3) Cytogenetic data undoubtedly revealed that space radiation exposure produce significant damage in cells. However, our knowledge of the basic mechanisms specific to low-dose, to repeated doses and to adaptive response is still poor. The application of new radiobiological techniques, like immunofluorescence, and the use of human tissue models different from blood, like skin fibroblasts, may help in clarifying all the above items.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cytogenetic data unequivocally reveals that space radiation exposure produces significant damage to cells.
“Cytogenetic data unequivocally reveals that space radiation exposure produces significant damage to cells [28].”
From Space Radiation: The number one risk to astronaut health beyond low earth orbit (2014) · cites this paper as [28]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 116 · Cited by 96
- Authors
- MAALOUF, M., DURANTE, M., & FORAY, N.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- FORAY, Nicolas
- Venue
- Journal of Radiation Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 126-146
- ISSN
- 0449-3060 (ISSN-L)
- 1349-9157
- OpenAlex
- W2138352856
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 116
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Radiation Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- GSI Repository (German Federal Government) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
- Keywords
- space radiation, space radiation biology, human cells, low-dose radiation, adaptive response, chromosomal damage, radiation-induced cancer, radiation toxicity, individual susceptibility, dermal fibroblasts, immunofluorescence, astronaut health risk
- MeSH terms
- Cosmic Radiation, Cytogenetics, DNA Damage, Fibroblasts, Humans, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Radiation Dosage, Radiobiology, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Space Flight, Astronauts, Heavy Ions, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review