Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 362

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning Progressions in Science: An Evidence-based Approach to Reform

Open access
Corcoran, Tom, Mosher, Frederic, Rogat, Aaron·2009
DOI 10.12698/cpre.2009.rr63
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

and principal investigator of the Center on Continuous Instructional Improvement (CCII).Corcoran's research interests include strategies for improving instruction, the use of research findings and clinical expertise to inform instructional policy and practice, the effectiveness of different approaches to professional development, knowledge management systems for schools, and the impact of changes in work environments on the productivity of teachers and students.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12698/cpre.2009.rr63

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 362

Metadata

Authors
Corcoran, T., Mosher, F., & Rogat, A.
Publisher
Consortium for Policy Research in Education
Published
2009-05-01
DOI
10.12698/cpre.2009.rr63
OpenAlex
W1545396227
Cited by
362
References
23
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning Progressions in Science: An Evidence-based Approach to Reform. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.12698/cpre.2009.rr63
The paper
Corcoran, T., Mosher, F., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning Progressions in Science: An Evidence-based Approach to Reform. https://doi.org/10.12698/cpre.2009.rr63

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.