Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Overcoming lexical interference in Chinese students learning Russian

Jia, Ma·2025·Russian Journal of Education and Psychology

Abstract

Background. The article addresses the issue of lexical interference among Chinese students learning Russian as a foreign language. This phenomenon is due to significant differences between the structural and semantic systems of the two languages. Lexical interference errors are manifested in calquing, violations of lexical collocations, semantic substitutions, and the use of words in inappropriate contexts, all of which hinder the development of stable lexical competence. Purpose. The aim of the study is to identify the typical manifestations of lexical interference among Chinese-speaking students and to substantiate effective methodological approaches for overcoming it in the process of teaching Russian. Materials and methods. The methodological basis includes the analysis of students’ written and oral works, questionnaire surveys, and a pedagogical experiment involving a set of adapted exercises aimed at developing conscious and contextually appropriate lexical usage. Results. The experimental part was conducted among 50 second-year students at one of the universities in the People's Republic of China. The participants were divided into control and experimental groups. The results of the comparative analysis showed that the use of contrastive tasks, lexico-semantic exercises, and digital learning tools contributed to a 37.3% reduction in lexical errors in written speech and a 43.3% reduction in oral speech in the experimental group. In addition, the students demonstrated increased confidence in their ability to use Russian vocabulary in real communication situations. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the comprehensive examination of lexical interference from both linguistic and cognitive psychological perspectives, as well as in the practical testing of the proposed methodology in a Chinese-language learning environment. The findings confirm the significance of systematic corrective work and can be implemented in Russian as a Foreign Language (RFL) programs at both beginner and intermediate levels. The results of the study lead to the conclusion that targeted work on lexical interference contributes not only to a decrease in error frequency but also to the development of confident lexical usage skills. The methodology developed within the framework of the research can be effectively applied in the practice of teaching RFL to students with a Chinese mother tongue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12731/2658-4034-2025-16-3-861

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.20323/1813-145X-2020-5-116-61-74 · DOI
  2. Vasina, E. A. (2019). On some qualitative and quantitative features of Chinese spoken speech in the context of simultaneous interpretation from Chinese by ear. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 22: Translation Theory, 2, 52-65. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/fwdqhl
  3. 10.22363/2618-8163-2024-22-1-135-149 · DOI
  4. Shevnin, A. B. (2004). Erratology and interlingual communication. Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2, 36-44. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/pjdjwl
  5. Shoin, Ch. (2024). Types of lexical errors in Russian-Chinese interference and their overcoming. Bulletin of I. Y. Yakovlev Chuvash State Pedagogical University, 2(123), 149-160. · DOI
  6. Shchennikova, N. V. (2013). Russian idioms in English: specifics of modal verbs usage. Scientific Bulletin of Voronezh State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Series: Modern Linguistic and Methodological-Didactic Research, 2, 111-125. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/rmynjt
  7. Antropova, M. Y., Vlasov, A. A., Kasyanenko, E. F. (2019). Mobile technologies in educational process of Chinese universities. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(5), 1-7. · DOI
  8. Kujalowicz, A., Zajdler, E. (2009). Language activation and lexical processing by Polish learners of English and Chinese - the role of learning experience in TLA. International Journal of Multilingualism, 6(1), 85-104. · DOI
  9. Mikitchenko, E. (2014). Mental representations of “road” and “path” at the comparative aspect. In International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Intercultural Communication (ICELAIC-14), 432-434. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Jia, M.
Venue
Russian Journal of Education and Psychology
Published
2025-08-31
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
157-172
ISSN
  • 2782-3563
  • 2658-4034
Cited by
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overcoming lexical interference in Chinese students learning Russian. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.12731/2658-4034-2025-16-3-861
The paper
Jia, M. (2025). Overcoming lexical interference in Chinese students learning Russian. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2025-16-3-861

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.