Cited by 13Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAugmented Reality Applications

Real-Life Contextualization of Exposure Therapy Using Augmented Reality: A Pilot Clinical Trial of a Novel Treatment Method

Javanbakht, Arash, Madaboosi, Shantanu, Grasser, Lana Ruvolo·2021·Annals of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Phobias, including arachnophobia, are common and can be treated with exposure therapy, a method that is limited by a lack of feared objects/situations in clinical settings. Methods In a pilot parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the feasibility and efficacy of augmented reality exposure therapy (ARET), 25 men and women ages 18 to 45 with arachnophobia were designated (ABAB block allocation) to ARET for arachnophobia (n = 13) or waitlist control (n = 12). Data were collected at baseline, 1-week, and 1-month follow-up, and single-session ARET occurred immediately following baseline collection for the intervention group. Results All ARET participants were able to touch a live tarantula or the tank containing it after single-session exposure; the control group remained >1 meter away from the tank. Effects persisted or improved at 1-month followup. The Fear of Spiders Questionnaire (FSQ) and Behavioral Approach Test (BAT) showed large, significant beneficial effects of ARET compared with a waitlist control group (BAT: P Conclusions We found ARET can feasibly be delivered using a wearable device running novel software with rapid responses and sustained effects. Replication and expansion of this pilot RCT will further support use of ARET for this and other specific phobias.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12788/acp.0042

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 28 · Cited by 13

Authors
Javanbakht, A., Madaboosi, S., & Grasser, L. R.
Affiliations
Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Javanbakht, Arash
Venue
Annals of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2021-11
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
220-231
ISSN
  • 1040-1237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-3325
OpenAlex
W3207155055
Cited by
13
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH120927)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD099178)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
Keywords
spider phobia, specific phobia, exposure therapy, wearable devices, fear extinction, treatment feasibility, single-session intervention
MeSH terms
Augmented Reality, Animals, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Phobic Disorders, Spiders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review