The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 18 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas
Open accessAbstract
In the last decades, cultural tourism has become an alternative to other tourist typologies, since a more complementary offer is necessary. This expansion of culture as a tourism product has led to the proliferation of routes and tourist-cultural itineraries, promoted by regional, national and international organizations. These tourist realities have generated a multitude of definitions by organisms and authors, giving rise to a debate on two concepts that although they share similarities can be considered different. In the diffusion, creation and recognition of routes and itineraries, the different Spanish autonomous governments play a fundamental role. In this sense, through the creation of official websites, the Autonomous Communities try to publicize their culture and their tourism products. On the one hand, the objective of this work is to analyze the concepts of cultural tourism route and itinerary, on the other hand the dissemination of tourist routes and the treatment of itineraries by the Autonomous Communities in their official portals will be studied.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper conceptually distinguishes tourist routes from cultural itineraries and then examines how Spain’s autonomous community tourism portals present these products. It finds widespread terminological confusion and limited use of European cultural itineraries, despite routes and itineraries being a fundamental part of official cultural tourism offers.
Key findings
- Conceptually, routes are tourism products/inventions with a subjective, instrumental character, while cultural itineraries are historically developed paths responding to human needs and have patrimonial value in the route itself (Table 1).
- In the official portals, routes and itineraries are confused in most autonomous communities, except Galicia, Asturias, and Navarra (17.6% of the total sample).
- European cultural itineraries are offered in 13 of 15 autonomous communities (86.6% of the sample), but only 3 of the 22 European cultural itineraries declared in Spain—Camino de Santiago, Ruta de Carlos V, and El Legado Andalusí—appear in official portals. The Camino de Santiago appears in all communities it crosses except Andalucía and Extremadura.
- Among route typologies, geographic routes are most abundant (76.4%), followed by ethnographic (52.9%), artistic (29.4%), and religious (23.5%) routes; classification is not standardized across portals.
Methods
- Conceptual analysis of definitions from the RAE, authors, and international bodies (Council of Europe 2002, ICOMOS 2008, MERCOSUR 2009), summarized in a comparative table of routes versus cultural itineraries.
- Empirical review of the official tourism portals of the Spanish autonomous communities, with objectives including identifying available information, verifying the offer of routes and itineraries, checking whether the concepts are distinguished, and identifying commercial information.
- For European cultural itineraries, the study examined the official list and compared it with portal content, excluding Canarias and Baleares because no cultural itineraries are declared in those territories; route classifications on the websites were also crossed with a proposed route model.
Limitations
- The paper states that “some weaknesses detected in the analysis” exist but does not enumerate them.
- It states that if the study had been carried out by attending to existing routes rather than typologies, the results would differ and could include communities that do not offer route typologies.
- Evident from the text: the analysis relies on website content and official listings at the time of study, with no user testing or longitudinal verification reported.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
23 Own interpretation · 15 Sources not found · 10 Own result · 9 No basis given · 2 Own method · 1 Not checked yet
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Como se puede observar los itinerarios y las rutas turísticas consideradas culturales son un elemento fundamental en la oferta turística oficial de todas las comunidades autónomas.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The official tourism websites of the Spanish autonomous communities accurately reflect the institutional promotion and conceptualization of routes and itineraries.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“El camino de Santiago ocupa un papel predominante, apareciendo en todas las comunidades por las que discurre a excepción de Andalucía y Extremadura.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The official tourism websites of the Spanish autonomous communities accurately reflect the institutional promotion and conceptualization of routes and itineraries.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Este error se detecta en la difusión no diferenciada de estos productos turísticos sin tener en cuenta los elementos singulares de cada uno de ellos.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The official tourism websites of the Spanish autonomous communities accurately reflect the institutional promotion and conceptualization of routes and itineraries.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Además, la presentación de las mismas es en algunos casos incompleta, ya que falta información detallada que incluya algunos datos básicos de las rutas.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Aunque en el ámbito académico e institucional los términos de ruta e itinerario cultural estén claramente definidos, en la práctica existe una notable confusión en su uso por los organismos turísticos.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The official tourism websites of the Spanish autonomous communities accurately reflect the institutional promotion and conceptualization of routes and itineraries.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En la clasificación persiste en muchos casos, la confusión entre rutas e itinerarios, ya que es bastante frecuente que, en los apartados de rutas, aparezcan tanto rutas como itinerarios culturales como si fueran una misma categoría.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > Additional information
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En primer lugar, existe una falta de sistematización y homogeneización de la oferta de rutas e itinerarios en las CCAA.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The official tourism websites of the Spanish autonomous communities accurately reflect the institutional promotion and conceptualization of routes and itineraries.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En algunos casos la oferta difundida es deficiente no adecuándose a la realidad patrimonial y cultural de los territorios.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The official tourism websites of the Spanish autonomous communities accurately reflect the institutional promotion and conceptualization of routes and itineraries.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En segundo lugar, resulta especialmente llamativo el escaso uso que se está haciendo de los itinerarios culturales europeos salvo algunas excepciones (Camino de Santiago).”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The official tourism websites of the Spanish autonomous communities accurately reflect the institutional promotion and conceptualization of routes and itineraries.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No obstante, los resultados dejan ver que tan sólo 3 de los 22 itinerarios culturales europeos declarados en España (Camino de Santiago, Ruta de Carlos V y El Legado Andalusí), están presentes en los portales oficiales.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The official tourism websites of the Spanish autonomous communities accurately reflect the institutional promotion and conceptualization of routes and itineraries.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 28
- Probably not a substantial claim. 29
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Por un lado, algunas CCAA publicitan los itinerarios como si fueran rutas, mientras que por otro lado llaman itinerarios a los recorridos o trazados de las rutas turísticas.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The official tourism websites of the Spanish autonomous communities accurately reflect the institutional promotion and conceptualization of routes and itineraries.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Una de las características más palpables de los resultados del análisis de la oferta turístico-cultural es la confusión existente entre los conceptos de rutas e itinerarios culturales, salvo excepciones como en el caso de Galicia, Asturias y Navarra (un 17,6 % del total de la muestra).”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The official tourism websites of the Spanish autonomous communities accurately reflect the institutional promotion and conceptualization of routes and itineraries.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“El análisis efectuado pone de manifiesto que la oferta de itinerarios culturales europeos se realiza en 13 de la 15 CCAA (un 86,6% de la muestra).”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The official tourism websites of the Spanish autonomous communities accurately reflect the institutional promotion and conceptualization of routes and itineraries.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Por último, se debe destacar que todas las páginas institucionales de turismo promocionan la venta directa de alojamientos, hostelería y recursos turísticos, así como proporcionan información de las rutas.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > Additional information
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“De este modo, mientras que en algunas comunidades no se hace una clasificación exhaustiva de las rutas (Castilla la Mancha, Extremadura, Galicia, Comunidad Valenciana y las Islas Canarias), otras proponen su propia clasificación (Andalucía, Cataluña, País Vasco o Baleares).”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > Additional information
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Las rutas geográficas son las más abundantes (un total del 76,4% de la muestra) seguidas de las rutas etnográficas (52,9%), las artísticas (29,4%) y las religiosas (23,5%).”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > Additional information
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Debemos mencionar, además, que el tratamiento de los conceptos de ruta e itinerarios como conceptos sinónimos, afecta a la propia difusión de los itinerarios ya que, desde las instituciones, no se presentan al turista como un recurso diferente al de las rutas.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > Additional information
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Se excluyen las Islas Canarias y las Islas Baleares, ya que no hay itinerarios culturales declarados en estos territorios.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Además, debemos tener en cuenta que, desde el punto de vista de la ordenación y presentación de la información de la oferta turística en las diferentes webs oficiales, se puede afirmar que la misma no es homogénea.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > Additional information
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“En general se puede afirmar que no hay una clasificación estandarizada de los diferentes tipos de ruta y, por lo tanto, cada autor o institución elabora su propia clasificación (Arcila, M et al., 2015), sin tener presentes las conceptualizaciones ofrecidas por los diferentes organismos internacionales sobre esta materia.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Arcila, M et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Las referencias a los itinerarios se basan principalmente en su reconocimiento internacional, con pocas referencias al trazado como elemento patrimonial en sí.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > Additional information
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Por su parte, entendemos que el itinerario cultural es un recorrido desarrollado a lo largo del tiempo y que responde a necesidades humanas.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 3. RUTAS E ITINERARIOS CULTURALES: ANÁLISIS CONCEPTUAL
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Entendemos, por lo tanto, que en la estructuración de las rutas e itinerarios la diferencia reside en el aspecto subjetivo de las primeras (voluntad humana) en contraposición al elemento objetivo de las segundas (espacio geográfico).”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 3. RUTAS E ITINERARIOS CULTURALES: ANÁLISIS CONCEPTUAL
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Esta terminología nos da a entender que no todos los itinerarios son susceptibles de utilidad turística puesto que la misma dependerá de las características del itinerario, el interés que provoque y las posibilidades de desarrollo que genere.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 3. RUTAS E ITINERARIOS CULTURALES: ANÁLISIS CONCEPTUAL
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Por lo tanto, puede concluirse que tanto ruta como itinerario son conceptos con bastantes similitudes pero que se diferencian en la intencionalidad de su creación, su”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 3. RUTAS E ITINERARIOS CULTURALES: ANÁLISIS CONCEPTUAL
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Por un lado, la ruta implica un desplazamiento en el que la persona dispone de amplias facultades para establecer el recorrido del mismo en base a sus intereses.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 3. RUTAS E ITINERARIOS CULTURALES: ANÁLISIS CONCEPTUAL
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“no pueden confundirse los itinerarios culturales con las rutas turístico-culturales, porque los primeros responden a criterios históricos de autenticidad, de continuidad y de intercambios contrastados entre culturas, mientras que las segundas son invenciones turísticas de conveniencia, promovidas por agentes públicos o privados, que unen recursos patrimoniales más o menos homogéneos y vinculados”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 3. RUTAS E ITINERARIOS CULTURALES: ANÁLISIS CONCEPTUAL
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hernández (2011)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“La ruta es una invención siendo lo importante en ella no tanto el recorrido, el cual está creado con un interés turístico, sino el patrimonio natural, histórico, etnográfico, geográfico etc, que la compone y justifica.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 3. RUTAS E ITINERARIOS CULTURALES: ANÁLISIS CONCEPTUAL
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“En lo que respecta al itinerario, el aspecto físico adquiere un mayor protagonismo, puesto que el trazado atenderá a una necesidad perpetuada en el tiempo (religiosa, militar, comercial etc.), dejando poco margen a la capacidad humana para definir su recorrido (Castillo, 2006).”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 3. RUTAS E ITINERARIOS CULTURALES: ANÁLISIS CONCEPTUAL
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Castillo, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Es a partir de esta fecha y fundamentalmente desde 1998 cuando tiene un mayor uso, ya que asistimos a la creación del comité internacional de itinerarios culturales (Vidargas, 2011).”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 3. RUTAS E ITINERARIOS CULTURALES: ANÁLISIS CONCEPTUAL
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Vidargas, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tomando como puntos de referencia las definiciones y aportaciones realizadas por autores y organismos, debe entenderse que las rutas e itinerarios son conceptos que, aun compartiendo elementos comunes, son realidades diferentes, aunque complementarias.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 3. RUTAS E ITINERARIOS CULTURALES: ANÁLISIS CONCEPTUAL
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Por su parte el concepto de itinerario cultural europeo pretende destacar el carácter europeo de los itinerarios, como elemento de cohesión e identidad cultural, pasando a un segundo plano la concepción turística del itinerario (Tendré, 2007).”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 3. RUTAS E ITINERARIOS CULTURALES: ANÁLISIS CONCEPTUAL
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Tendré, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“La puesta en valor del itinerario es el propio recorrido y no tanto los elementos que lo integran, aunque estos últimos sean un factor que permitan entender el porqué de la existencia del itinerario.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 3. RUTAS E ITINERARIOS CULTURALES: ANÁLISIS CONCEPTUAL
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En este sentido, desde nuestro punto de vista se pueden conceptualizar las rutas como un elemento esencialmente turístico, es decir, un producto confeccionado utilizando los recursos territoriales.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 3. RUTAS E ITINERARIOS CULTURALES: ANÁLISIS CONCEPTUAL
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Información obtenida de la web del Consejo de Europa( https://www.coe.int/en/web/culturalroutes/spain)y contrastada en el portal oficial del Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Se puede concluir que a pesar del uso confuso de los conceptos por parte de las CCAA y de algunas debilidades detectadas en el análisis, se observa que el avance del turismocultural y, por ende, de las rutas e itinerarios, es constante.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Esta proliferación de rutas e itinerarios se justifica en la necesidad de diversificación de la oferta turística y los beneficios del turismo cultural para el sector.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > Additional information
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: El turismo cultural aporta ventajas al sector: desestacionalización de la demanda, perfil socioeconómico elevado de los usuarios, impulso de la economía local sostenible y bajo impacto ambiental.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En lo que respecta a los itinerarios culturales, entendemos que son realidades diferentes a las rutas por su origen y configuración.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En términos generales se puede afirmar que el interés existente por la definición y diferenciación de los conceptos de rutas e itinerarios culturales se explica por la demanda de los mismos como productos turísticos.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > Additional information
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Por otro lado, el auge de las rutas culturales ha generado un cambio en la percepción del patrimonio, entendiéndose como una herramienta de desarrollo territorial, propiciando su conservación y puesta en valor (Capel, 2005).”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Capel, 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Por otro lado, se ha consolidado su demanda como producto turístico ampliándose su oferta en mercados como EEUU y Australia (Santos, 2006).”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Santos, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“turismo como sector económico estratégico y los deseos de los gobiernos autonómicos de promocionarse como destinos turísticos (Rengifo, 2006).”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Rengifo, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En este sentido se debe indicar que, si el estudio se realizara atendiendo a las rutas existentes dejando al margen las tipologías, los resultados serían diferentes y se podrían incluir a aquellas comunidades que no ofrecen tipologías de rutas.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > Additional information
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Además, en muchos casos, el deseo de favorecer la existencia de estos productos ha facilitado la colaboración entre los ciudadanos y las instituciones (Briedenhann y Wikens, 2003).”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Briedenhann y Wikens, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Aunque los itinerarios no tienen una finalidad exclusivamente turística, son un elemento representativo de la cultura de las regiones y, por consiguiente, un instrumento que puede facilitar la diferenciación en el mercado de los destinos.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“De igual forma los ciudadanos y residentes en esos espacios, mejoran su visión del patrimonio con esta puesta en valor.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > Additional information
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ello demuestra la relevancia que ha adquirido dicho itinerario a nivel nacional y europeo, con la condición de gran itinerario cultural concedida en 2004 y el Premio Príncipe de Asturias a la Concordia ese mismo año.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The official tourism websites of the Spanish autonomous communities accurately reflect the institutional promotion and conceptualization of routes and itineraries.
In the paper
“En este sentido, gracias a la transferencia de competencias en materia de turismo por parte del gobierno central a las CCAA (Parada, 2013), las distintas instituciones autonómicas han elaborado y fomentado las rutas turísticas y los itinerarios mediante publicaciones, páginas web, creación de equipamientos y señalética.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 4. ORIGEN DE LAS RUTAS Y MARCO COMPETENCIAL DE LAS CCAA.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Parada, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Al estudiar el concepto de ruta, debemos tener en cuenta que no se presenta con un carácter uniforme porque la definición depende de los objetivos, el diseño, la temática o la metodología aplicada en la creación de la ruta (Rivera, 2016).”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Rivera, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Con posterioridad las instituciones y organismos han ido concretando sus definiciones sobre itinerarios, siendo las propuestas más interesantes las ofrecidas por el Consejo de Europa en 2002, la de ICOMOS en 2008 y MERCOSUR en 2009.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Consejo de Europa, 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites ICOMOS, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites MERCOSUR, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Estos primeros intentos, aunque todavía alejados de una especificación más exhaustiva, ponen de manifiesto la toma de conciencia por parte de las instituciones de cara a entender cómo se configuran los itinerarios y los elementos que intervienen en ese proceso.”
§ Las Rutas e Itinerarios Turístico-Culturales en los Portales Oficiales de Turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas Españolas Tourist-Cultural Routes and Itineraries in the Official Tourism Portals of the Spanish > 5.2. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
Los conceptos de ruta e itinerario turístico-cultural se confunden con frecuencia.
“Es frecuente que los conceptos de ruta e itinerarios turísticos culturales se confundan, aunque existan notables diferencias entre ambas realidades.”
The paper relies on this without support.
La confusión entre rutas e itinerarios turístico-culturales se produce a partir de la década de 1990.
“Se puede establecer que dicha confusión se produce a partir de la década de 1990, cuando los itinerarios comienzan a ser reconocidos y se hace hincapié en conocer los elementos diferenciadores entre las rutas y los itinerarios culturales.”
The paper relies on this without support.
En la actualidad no hay una definición comúnmente aceptada de ruta turística.
“no obstante, en la actualidad no hay una definición comúnmente aceptada de ruta turística.”
The paper relies on this without support.
El diseño de una ruta turística y el reconocimiento de los itinerarios culturales aumentan los beneficios y diversifican la oferta turística de una región.
“El diseño de una ruta turística y el reconocimiento de los itinerarios culturales pretende intervenir en el sector turístico de manera que, mediante la oferta de un producto de calidad, se aumenten los beneficios y se diversifique la oferta turística de una determinada región.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The official tourism websites of the Spanish autonomous communities accurately reflect the institutional promotion and conceptualization of routes and itineraries.
“De la aplicación de la metodología antes expuesta, en todas las páginas web de los portales de turismo de las Comunidades Autónomas, se han obtenido una serie de resultados que se expondrán en las siguientes páginas y que pueden resumirse en el gráfico 1.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Some itineraries are of recent creation and have an instrumental character, while others are consolidated and have their own historical layout.
“Debemos tener en cuenta que, mientras que algunos itinerarios son de reciente creación (Ruta de los Cementerios o la Ruta de los Fenicios) y tienen un carácter instrumental, otros están consolidados y cuentan con un trazado histórico propio (Camino de Santiago o la Vía de la Plata).”
The paper relies on this without support.
El turismo cultural aporta ventajas al sector: desestacionalización de la demanda, perfil socioeconómico elevado de los usuarios, impulso de la economía local sostenible y bajo impacto ambiental.
“Estas ventajas se resumen en desestacionalización de la demanda, perfil socio económico elevado de los usuarios, impulso de la economía local sostenible y su bajo impacto ambiental.”
Citations
Cites
Briedenhann, J., & Wickens, E. (2003) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/s0261-5177(03)00063-3 · Cited by 941
Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales
(España), U. D. S., & Hernández Ramírez, J. (2011) · PASOS. Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural · doi:10.25145/j.pasos.2011.09.021 · Cited by 88
EL CAMINO DE SANTIAGO: TURISTAS Y PEREGRINOS HACIA COMPOSTELA
Solla, X. M. S. (2006) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 66
Velarde, M. C. (2018) · Rilce Revista de Filología Hispánica · doi:10.15581/008.6.27711 · Cited by 45
REVISTA DE ESTUDIOS ANDALUCES - Vol. 35 - Número 1 (2018)
(2018) · Revista de Estudios Andaluces · doi:10.12795/rea.2018.i35 · Cited by 43
Carta Internacional sobre Turismo Cultural
Nava, N. Z. (2015) · "PATRIMONIO": ECONOMÍA CULTURAL Y EDUCACIÓN PARA LA PAZ (MEC-EDUPAZ) · Cited by 39
Calidad de los sitios web tur�sticos oficiales de las comunidades aut�nomas espa�olas
Fernández-Cavia, J., Vinyals-Mirabent, S., & Pérez, M. L. (2014) · BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació · doi:10.1344/bid2014.31.7 · Cited by 21
Turismo cultural como experiencia educativa de ocio
Orduna, G., & Urpf, C. (2010) · Polis (Santiago) · doi:10.4067/s0718-65682010000200005 · Cited by 20
Cultural routes: Tangible and intangible dimensions of cultural heritage
Carreño, A. M. (2003) · Cited by 19
Turismo, la mayor propaganda de Estado: España desde sus inicios hasta 1951
Martínez, M. R. C., & Ruiz, B. C. (2008) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 11
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Revista de Estudios Andaluces, núm. 35 (2018) pp. 123-145. e-ISSN: 2340-2776 http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2018.i35.05 Esta obra se distribuye con la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial- SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional 143
- OTM. (2005). El turismo urbano y la cultura-La experiencia europea. Madrid, OTM. Oxford University Press. (2008). Gran diccionario OXFORD Español-inglés, inglés- español. 4º Edición. Oxford University Press.
- iaph.es/revistaph/index.php/revistaph/article/view/2259#.WlJmM0xFzIU > Revista de Estudios Andaluces, núm. 35 (2018) pp. 123-145. e-ISSN: 2340-2776 http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2018.i35.05
- Revista de Estudios Andaluces, núm. 35 (2018) pp. 123-145. e-ISSN: 2340-2776 http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2018.i35.05 Esta obra se distribuye con la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial- SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional 145
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tourism routes: a scoping review
Pedrosa, A., Martins, F. M. C. P. F., & Breda, Z. M. D. J. (2022) · European Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.54055/ejtr.v32i.2575 · Cited by 35
Martín, J. M. S., Gascón, J. L. G., & García-Berzosa, M. J. (2020) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi9040200 · Cited by 29
Díaz, B. E. G., Hernández, R. P., & Chamorro, E. T. (2019) · Cuadernos de Turismo · doi:10.6018/turismo.44.404801 · Cited by 15
The critical success factors for tourism routes development: A systematic review
Pedrosa, A., Martins, F. M. C. P. F., & Breda, Z. M. D. J. (2025) · European Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.54055/ejtr.v39i.3439 · Cited by 12
Proposal for the Design of Cultural Tourist Routes through the Use of GIS: An Applied Case.
Puerta, D. M. C., & Garrido, M. A. (2020) · Revista de Estudios Andaluces · doi:10.12795/rea.2020.i39.07 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Manuel Calderón-Puerta, D., Arcila-Garrido, M. L., & López-Sánchez, J. A.
- Venue
- Revista de Estudios Andaluces
- Publisher
- Editorial Universidad de Sevilla
- Published
- 2018
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 123-145
- ISSN
- 0212-8594 (ISSN-L)
- 2340-2776
- OpenAlex
- W2789367300
- Semantic Scholar
- b7ae68f296cf3dfe1fe30621fbf3a75f70b25ef2
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 10.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Revista de Estudios Andaluces (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Revista de Estudios Andaluces (cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Urbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
- Keywords
- cultural tourism, tourism routes, travel itineraries, official tourism websites, autonomous communities, regional tourism policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
