Cited by 2,751Information Systems Theories and ImplementationInformation Technology Governance and StrategyInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development

Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact

Orlikowski, Wanda J., Iacono, C. Suzanne·2001·Information Systems Research

Abstract

The field of information systems is premised on the centrality of information technology in everyday socio-economic life. Yet, drawing on a review of the full set of articles published in Information Systems Research (ISR) over the past ten years, we argue that the field has not deeply engaged its core subject matter—the information technology (IT) artifact. Instead, we find that IS researchers tend to give central theoretical significance to the context (within which some usually unspecified technology is seen to operate), the discrete processing capabilities of the artifact (as separable from its context or use), or the dependent variable (that which is posited to be affected or changed as technology is developed, implemented, and used). The IT artifact itself tends to disappear from view, be taken for granted, or is presumed to be unproblematic once it is built and installed. After discussing the implications of our findings, we propose a research direction for the IS field that begins to take technology as seriously as its effects, context, and capabilities. In particular, we propose that IS researchers begin to theorize specifically about IT artifacts, and then incorporate these theories explicitly into their studies. We believe that such a research direction is critical if IS research is to make a significant contribution to the understanding of a world increasingly suffused with ubiquitous, interdependent, and emergent information technologies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 2,751

Authors
Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • U.S. National Science Foundation (US)
Venue
Information Systems Research
Published
2001-06
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
121-134
ISSN
  • 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5536
OpenAlex
W2123601949
Cited by
2,751
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 124 · 2015: 155 · 2014: 174 · 2013: 181 · 2012: 171
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
information systems research agenda, technological capabilities, ubiquitous information technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review