The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Embedded Premium Promotion: Why It Works and How to Make It More Effective
Abstract
In this paper we define an embedded premium (EP) as an enhancement that involves a social cause added on to a product or service. We characterize EP as a sales promotion strategy and juxtapose it with traditional approaches, such as discounts and rebates. Across three experiments, using a nationwide Internet panel and employing stated measures and model-based inference, we find that at low denominations EP is more effective than an equivalent price discount. We describe how an EP’s social association may influence consumer choice quite differently than price promotions and, contrary to the asymmetric price promotion effect documented in the promotions literature, we find that EP benefits an unknown brand more than a known brand. Our hierarchical Bayes approach uncovers heterogeneity in EP effectiveness that can be explained by affinity toward the focal charity, personal motivations, and demographic markers. An identifiable segment of individuals prefer the “other” over “self,” suggesting possible EP optimization and segmentation strategies. Two such strategies, customization and coverage, are empirically tested, and the former is shown to be very effective. Our findings have broad implications for brand managers with regard to resource allocation and EP program return on investment (ROI), as well as important social welfare implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 · Cited by 6,606
Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving
Andreoni, J. (1990) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234133 · Cited by 5,825
Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838 · Cited by 4,659
Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis.
Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Slingsby, J. K., Harrell, K. L., Peekna, H. M., & Todd, R. M. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.413 · Cited by 793 · cited 1×
“Coding for this analysis was guided by literature from economics and social psychology, which suggests that individuals may choose to help others for either self or other reasons (Andreoni and Miller 2002, Batson et al. 1991 ).”
MethodThe Value of Purchase History Data in Target Marketing
Rossi, P. E., McCulloch, R. E., & Allenby, G. M. (1996) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.15.4.321 · Cited by 754
Pracejus, J. W., Olsen, G. D., & Brown, N. R. (2003) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2003.10639146 · Cited by 196
Cited by
The Impact of Strategic Relevance and Assurance of Sustainability Indicators on Investors' Decisions
Cheng, M. M., Green, W. J., & Ko, J. C. W. (2015) · AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/ajpt-50738 · Cited by 317
Examining the Impact of Ranking on Consumer Behavior and Search Engine Revenue
Ghose, A., Ipeirotis, P. G., & Li, B. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1828 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Arora, N., & Henderson, T.
- Venue
- Marketing Science
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 514-531
- ISSN
- 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-548X
- OpenAlex
- W2167467418
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 16.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Embedded Premium Promotion: Why It Works and How to Make It More Effective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mksc.1060.0247
- The paper
- Arora, N., & Henderson, T. (2007). Embedded Premium Promotion: Why It Works and How to Make It More Effective. Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.