Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 225

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Modeling Multiple Sources of Heterogeneity in Multinomial Logit Models: Methodological and Managerial Issues

Gönül, Füsun, Srinivasan, Kannan·1993·Marketing Science

Abstract

We offer a framework to specify and estimate various sources of heterogeneity in multinomial logit brand choice models. We let each brand-specific intercept and each parameter of the explanatory variable vector vary randomly across households. In addition, we distinguish loyal households from the rest. Our results suggest that incorporating multiple sources of heterogeneity improves the model fit and suggests higher impact of marketing mix elements on brand choice. We highlight the importance of incorporating multiple sources of heterogeneity. The model we implement yields valuable managerial insights.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/mksc.12.3.213

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 225

Metadata

Authors
Gönül, F., & Srinivasan, K.
Venue
Marketing Science
Published
1993-08
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
213-229
ISSN
  • 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-548X
OpenAlex
W2162487260
Cited by
225
References
0
FWCI
36.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling Multiple Sources of Heterogeneity in Multinomial Logit Models: Methodological and Managerial Issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mksc.12.3.213
The paper
Gönül, F., & Srinivasan, K. (1993). Modeling Multiple Sources of Heterogeneity in Multinomial Logit Models: Methodological and Managerial Issues. Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.12.3.213

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.