The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Empirical Generalizations from Reference Price Research
Abstract
Considerable theoretical justification for consumers' use of psychological reference points exists from the research literature. From a managerial perspective, one of the most important applications of this concept is reference price, an internal standard against which observed prices are compared. In this paper, we propose three empirical generalizations that are well-supported in the marketing literature. First, there is ample evidence that consumers use reference prices in making brand choices. Second, the empirical results on reference pricing also support the generalization that consumers rely on past prices as part of the reference price formation process. Third, consistent with other research on loss aversion, consumers have been found to be more sensitive to “losses,” i.e. observed prices higher than reference prices, than “gains.” We also propose topics for further research on reference prices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice
Hardie, B. G. S., Johnson, E. J., & Fader, P. S. (1993) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.12.4.378 · Cited by 903 · cited 1×
“1992, Hardie et al. 1993, Kalyanaram and Little 1994) that provide support for this generalization. The general approach of framing this problem is that consumers perceive prices above the reference price as losses, and prices below the reference price as gains. Employing such a definition, Kalyanaram and Little (1989…”
Result
Cited by
Reference Price Research: Review and Propositions
Mazumdar, T., Raj, S. P., & Sinha, I. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.84 · Cited by 848
Bolton, R. N., Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2004) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070304263341 · Cited by 741
Dynamic Pricing Strategies with Reference Effects
Popescu, I., & Wu, Y. (2007) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.1070.0393 · Cited by 447
The Long-Term Effects of Price Promotions on Category Incidence, Brand Choice, and Purchase Quantity
Pauwels, K., Hanssens, D. M., & Siddarth, S. (2002) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.39.4.421.19114 · Cited by 444
Managing Advertising and Promotion for Long-Run Profitability
Jedidi, K., Mela, C. F., & Gupta, S. (1999) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.18.1.1 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalyanaram, G., & Winer, R. S.
- Venue
- Marketing Science
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3_supplement
- Pages
- G161-G169
- ISSN
- 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-548X
- OpenAlex
- W1978537395
- Cited by
- 791
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Empirical Generalizations from Reference Price Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mksc.14.3.g161
- The paper
- Kalyanaram, G., & Winer, R. S. (1995). Empirical Generalizations from Reference Price Research. Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.14.3.g161
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.