The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Positioning and Pricing a Product Line
Abstract
A central problem in marketing is: how should the firm position (reposition) and price a line of related (substitute) products in order to maximize profits (or welfare). We formulate this problem faced by a monopolist as a mathematical program, outline how to obtain the market data from a sample of customers, discuss what cost data are relevant, and suggest a heuristic algorithm to solve the problem. The output of the process is a list of products to offer, their prices, and the customer segments which purchase each product. While additional real world complexities, e.g., uncertainty about customer wants, product performance, and competitive response, are not modeled, we believe the system developed can serve as an important input into the decision process when new products are designed and priced. The methodology can be used as a part of a decision support system, where management specifies the number of products desired. The system suggests a few good solutions, together with the prices and customer segments served by each product. We use the standard assumption that the market is composed of different customer segments of various sizes, each containing homogeneous customers. Customers choose one brand only, the one that provides them with maximum value for the money. The firm faces both fixed and variable production and marketing costs for each product. Competition is either nonexistent, or assumed not to respond to the firm's moves. The information available to the firm is the sizes and preferences of the segments, based on a sample of customers, and the cost data. As an alternative to the traditional approach of estimating a parametric utility function, and aggregating customers into segments, we can also use the raw data as input, where each customer in the sample represents a segment. This, we believe, allows us to reduce the errors introduced in the process. Heuristics for solving the problem are suggested. The heuristics are evaluated on a set of simulated problems, and compared to the optimal solutions. The heuristics perform well when compared to all feasible solutions on a set of small simulated problems. We also discuss the application of the procedure to a ‘real life’ sized problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mussa, M., & Rosen, S. (1978) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(78)90085-6 · Cited by 3,306
Cited by
Market Segmentation, Cannibalization, and the Timing of Product Introductions
Moorthy, K. S., & Png, I. P. L. (1992) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.38.3.345 · Cited by 503
The design and introduction of product lines when consumer valuations are uncertain
Biyalogorsky, E., & Koenigsberg, O. (2014) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12167 · Cited by 49
(2009) · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Dobson, G., & Kalish, S.
- Venue
- Marketing Science
- Published
- 1988-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-125
- ISSN
- 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-548X
- OpenAlex
- W2042462687
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positioning and Pricing a Product Line. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mksc.7.2.107
- The paper
- Dobson, G., & Kalish, S. (1988). Positioning and Pricing a Product Line. Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.7.2.107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.