The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Importance Sampling for Portfolio Credit Risk
Abstract
Monte Carlo simulation is widely used to measure the credit risk in portfolios of loans, corporate bonds, and other instruments subject to possible default. The accurate measurement of credit risk is often a rare-event simulation problem because default probabilities are low for highly rated obligors and because risk management is particularly concerned with rare but significant losses resulting from a large number of defaults. This makes importance sampling (IS) potentially attractive. But the application of IS is complicated by the mechanisms used to model dependence between obligors, and capturing this dependence is essential to a portfolio view of credit risk. This paper provides an IS procedure for the widely used normal copula model of portfolio credit risk. The procedure has two parts: One applies IS conditional on a set of common factors affecting multiple obligors, the other applies IS to the factors themselves. The relative importance of the two parts of the procedure is determined by the strength of the dependence between obligors. We provide both theoretical and numerical support for the method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Survey of Systemic Risk Analytics
Bisias, D., Flood, M., Lo, A. W., & Valavanis, S. (2012) · Annual Review of Financial Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-financial-110311-101754 · Cited by 659
Zhao, D., Lam, H., Peng, H., Bao, S., LeBlanc, D. J., Nobukawa, K., & Pan, C. S. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2016.2582208 · Cited by 445
A Survey of Systemic Risk Analytics
Bisias, D., Flood, M. D., Lo, A. W., & Valavanis, S. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1983602 · Cited by 331
Incorporating Artificial Intelligence into Healthcare Workflows: Models and Insights
Dai, T., & Abràmoff, M. D. (2023) · Tutorials in Operations Research: Advancing the Frontiers of OR/MS: From Methodologies to Applications · doi:10.1287/educ.2023.0257 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Glasserman, P., & Li, J.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1643-1656
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2170127976
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Importance Sampling for Portfolio Credit Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0415
- The paper
- Glasserman, P., & Li, J. (2005). Importance Sampling for Portfolio Credit Risk. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.