The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recruiting for Ideas: How Firms Exploit the Prior Inventions of New Hires
Abstract
When firms recruit inventors, they acquire not only the use of their skills but also enhanced access to their stock of ideas. But do hiring firms actually increase their use of new recruits' prior inventions? Our estimates suggest they do, quite significantly in fact, by approximately 219% on average. However, this does not necessarily reflect widespread “learning by hiring.” In fact, we estimate that a recruit's exploitation of her own prior ideas accounts for almost half of the above effect, with much of the diffusion to others being limited to the recruit's immediate collaborative network. Furthermore, although one might expect the recruit's role to diminish rapidly as her tacit knowledge diffuses across her new firm, our estimates indicate that her importance is surprisingly persistent over time. We base these findings on an empirical strategy that exploits the variation over time in hiring firms' citations to the recruits' premove patents. Specifically, we employ a difference-in-differences approach to compare premove versus postmove citation rates for the recruits' prior patents and corresponding matched-pair control patents. Our methodology has three benefits compared to previous studies that also examine the link between labor mobility and knowledge flow: (1) it does not suffer from the upward bias inherent in the conventional cross-sectional comparison, (2) it generates results that are robust to a more stringently matched control sample, and (3) it enables a temporal examination of knowledge flow patterns. This paper was accepted by Kamalini Ramdas, entrepreneurship and innovation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,152
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,802
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942 · cited 2×
“Firms need to balance this natural tendency towards exploitation of familiar knowledge with deliberate mechanisms that facilitate exploration of distant knowledge (March 1991), especially since combining ideas drawn from different sources is important for innovation success (Weitzman 1998, Fleming 2001, Chesbrough 200…”
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,366
The theory of the growth of the firm
Penrose, E. (1996) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(96)90295-2 · Cited by 13,770
The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view
Peteraf, M. A. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140303 · Cited by 10,716
Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009) · doi:10.1515/9781400829828 · Cited by 9,467
Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention
Arrow, K. J. (1962) · The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity · doi:10.1515/9781400879762-024 · Cited by 8,635
Cited by
Jia, N., Huang, K. G., & Man Zhang, C. (2019) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0543 · Cited by 532
How does social software change knowledge management? Toward a strategic research agenda
von Krogh, G. (2012) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2012.04.003 · Cited by 414
Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions
Argote, L., Lee, S., & Park, J. (2021) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3693 · Cited by 401
Reconceptualizing Stars: Scientist Helpfulness and Peer Performance
Oettl, A. (2012) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1470 · Cited by 285
Knowledge transfer in organizations: The roles of members, tasks, tools, and networks
Argote, L., & Fahrenkopf, E. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.003 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, J., & Agrawal, A.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-150
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2075697078
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 83
- FWCI
- 33.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recruiting for Ideas: How Firms Exploit the Prior Inventions of New Hires. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1253
- The paper
- Singh, J., & Agrawal, A. (2011). Recruiting for Ideas: How Firms Exploit the Prior Inventions of New Hires. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.