The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining the Impact of Ranking on Consumer Behavior and Search Engine Revenue
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we study the effects of three different kinds of search engine rankings on consumer behavior and search engine revenues: direct ranking effect, interaction effect between ranking and product ratings, and personalized ranking effect. We combine a hierarchical Bayesian model estimated on approximately one million online sessions from Travelocity, together with randomized experiments using a real-world hotel search engine application. Our archival data analysis and randomized experiments are consistent in demonstrating the following: (1) A consumer-utility-based ranking mechanism can lead to a significant increase in overall search engine revenue. (2) Significant interplay occurs between search engine ranking and product ratings. An inferior position on the search engine affects “higher-class” hotels more adversely. On the other hand, hotels with a lower customer rating are more likely to benefit from being placed on the top of the screen. These findings illustrate that product search engines could benefit from directly incorporating signals from social media into their ranking algorithms. (3) Our randomized experiments also reveal that an “active” personalized ranking system (wherein users can interact with and customize the ranking algorithm) leads to higher clicks but lower purchase propensities and lower search engine revenue compared with a “passive” personalized ranking system (wherein users cannot interact with the ranking algorithm). This result suggests that providing more information during the decision-making process may lead to fewer consumer purchases because of information overload. Therefore, product search engines should not adopt personalized ranking systems by default. Overall, our study unravels the economic impact of ranking and its interaction with social media on product search engines. This paper was accepted by Lorin Hitt, information systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, buyers are more likely to select an item higher up on the search results page, implying some sort of search costs.”
From Reputation and Feedback Systems in Online Platform Markets (2016) · cites this paper as Ghose et al. 2014
In the citing paper
“The literature on search costs has demonstrated a correlation between ranking and purchase (or click-through) behavior (Ghose et al. 2014).”
From Reputation and Feedback Systems in Online Platform Markets (2016) · cites this paper as Ghose et al. 2014
In the citing paper
“Empirical and theoretical work shows that positions and rankings can causally shape what consumers examine and buy.”
From What Is Your AI Agent Buying? Evaluation, Biases, Model Dependence, & Emerging Implications for Agentic E-Commerce (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“That said, several patterns we document mirror directionally human behavior-ranking/position materially shape choices in digital markets [14, 41], and platform endorsements/badges shift demand [29].”
From What Is Your AI Agent Buying? Evaluation, Biases, Model Dependence, & Emerging Implications for Agentic E-Commerce (2025) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345 · Cited by 6,003
Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379102800305 · Cited by 5,853
Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm
Chib, S., & Greenberg, E. (1995) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1995.10476177 · Cited by 4,212
Measuring Market Power in the Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry
Nevo, A. (1998) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00194 · Cited by 2,025
Bayesian Statistics and Marketing
Rossi, P. E., & Allenby, G. M. (2003) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.22.3.304.17739 · Cited by 1,116
Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness
Avi Goldfarb, B., & Tucker, C. E. (2011) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1100.0583 · Cited by 801
Aral, S., & Walker, D. (2011) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1421 · Cited by 786
The Value of Purchase History Data in Target Marketing
Rossi, P. E., McCulloch, R. E., & Allenby, G. M. (1996) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.15.4.321 · Cited by 754
An Empirical Analysis of Search Engine Advertising: Sponsored Search in Electronic Markets
Ghose, A., & Yang, S. (2009) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1054 · Cited by 684
Self-citationGhose, A., Ipeirotis, P. G., & Li, B. (2012) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1110.0700 · Cited by 649
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.2307/3172866 · DOI · Paper page
- Greene W, 1999, Econometric Analysis
- Koulayev S, 2014, RAND J. Econom.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The business value of online consumer reviews and management response to hotel performance
Xie, K., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, Z. (2014) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.07.007 · Cited by 660
Reputation and Feedback Systems in Online Platform Markets
Tadelis, S. (2016) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015325 · Cited by 524
Rosario, A. B., Valck, K. D., & Sotgiu, F. (2019) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00706-1 · Cited by 590
Platform-Dependent Entrepreneurs: Power Asymmetries, Risks, and Strategies in the Platform Economy
Cutolo, D., & Kenney, M. (2021) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2019.0103 · Cited by 507
Cultural Differences and Geography as Determinants of Online Prosocial Lending1
Burtch, G., Ghose, A., & Wattal, S. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.3.07 · Cited by 398
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghose, A., Ipeirotis, P. G., & Li, B.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1632-1654
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2136522867
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 52.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- search engine ranking, personalized ranking, search engine revenue, consumer behavior, product ratings, online travel, social media signals, information overload, purchase intention, click-through rate, ranking algorithms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review