The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analyst Information Discovery and Interpretation Roles: A Topic Modeling Approach
Abstract
This study examines analyst information intermediary roles using a textual analysis of analyst reports and corporate disclosures. We employ a topic modeling methodology from computational linguistic research to compare the thematic content of a large sample of analyst reports issued promptly after earnings conference calls with the content of the calls themselves. We show that analysts discuss exclusive topics beyond those from conference calls and interpret topics from conference calls. In addition, we find that investors place a greater value on new information in analyst reports when managers face greater incentives to withhold value-relevant information. Analyst interpretation is particularly valuable when the processing costs of conference call information increase. Finally, we document that investors react to analyst report content that simply confirms managers’ conference call discussions. Overall, our study shows that analysts play the information intermediary roles by discovering information beyond corporate disclosures and by clarifying and confirming corporate disclosures. The Internet appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2751 . This paper was accepted by Suraj Srinivasan, accounting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introduction to information retrieval
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2715 · Cited by 12,278
Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00018-0 · Cited by 8,097
An algorithm for suffix stripping
Porter, M. F. (1980) · Program · doi:10.1108/eb046814 · Cited by 8,096 · cited 1×
“For example, standard stemming would convert “marketing” into “market,” “accounting” into “account,” “investment” into “invest,” and both “operating” and “operation” into “oper” (Porter 1980).”
The economic implications of corporate financial reporting
Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002 · Cited by 6,316
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101 · Cited by 6,049
Blei, D. M. (2012) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2133806.2133826 · Cited by 5,516
Speaking: From Intention to Articulation
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001 · Cited by 4,804
Speaking. From Intention to Articulation
Caplan, D. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90151-y · Cited by 4,008
Verrecchia, R. E. (1983) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/0165-4101(83)90011-3 · Cited by 3,481
Cross-Sectional Determinants of Analyst Ratings of Corporate Disclosures
Lang, M., & Lundholm, R. (1993) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.2307/2491273 · Cited by 2,637
Cited by
Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review
Blankespoor, E., deHaan, E., & Marinovic, I. (2020) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101344 · Cited by 1,076
The evolution of 10-K textual disclosure: Evidence from Latent Dirichlet Allocation
Dyer, T., Lang, M., & Stice-Lawrence, L. (2017) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.07.002 · Cited by 841
The Role of Corporate Culture in Bad Times: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic
Li, K., Liu, X., Mai, F., & Zhang, T. (2021) · Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.1017/s0022109021000326 · Cited by 253
Tang, W., Bu, H., Zuo, Y., & Wu, J. (2024) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2024.105062 · Cited by 19
Do Research Topics and Abstract Readability Affect Citation Impact in Leading Finance Journals?
Luo, Z., & Tse, Y. (2025) · Applied Finance Letters · doi:10.24135/afl.v14i.1059
“By contrast, BERTopic—leveraging deep semantic understanding, robustness to short texts, and a highly automated pipeline—outperforms LDA, co-word analysis, and STM in interpretability, scalability, and flexibility, and has recently demonstrated superior empirical performance (Tang et al., 2024; Teutloff et al., 2025).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, A. H., Lehavy, R., Zang, A. Y., & Zheng, R.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2833-2855
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W3124814550
- Cited by
- 585
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 87.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyst Information Discovery and Interpretation Roles: A Topic Modeling Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2751
- The paper
- Huang, A. H., Lehavy, R., Zang, A. Y., & Zheng, R. (2018). Analyst Information Discovery and Interpretation Roles: A Topic Modeling Approach. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2751
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.