Organizational and Economic Obstacles to Automation: A Cautionary Tale from AT&T in the Twentieth Century
Abstract
AT&T was the largest U.S. firm for most of the 20th century. Telephone operators once comprised more than 50% of its workforce, but in the late 1910s, it initiated a decades-long process of automating telephone operation with mechanical call switching—a technology invented in the 1880s. We study what drove AT&T to do so and why it took nearly a century. Interdependencies between call switching and nearly every other activity in AT&T’s business presented obstacles to change: Telephone operators were the fulcrum of a complex production system that had developed around them, and automation only began after the firm and new technology were adapted to work together. Even then, automatic switching was only profitable in larger markets—hence, diffusion expanded when the technology improved or service areas grew. The example suggests even narrowly defined tasks can be difficult to automate if they interact with many others. This paper was accepted by Joshua Gans, business strategy. Funding: The authors thank the Duke University Fuqua School of Business and Harvard Business School Division of Research and Faculty Development for financial support. Supplemental Material: The online appendices and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01760 .
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The diffusion of general-purpose technologies literature stresses the need for complementary investments and coinvention.
“More broadly, the importance of employer initiatives for AI chatbot adoption echoes an extensive literature on the diffusion of general-purpose technologies, which stresses the need for complementary investments and coinvention (Bresnahan and Greenstein, 1996; David, 1990; Feigenbaum and Gross, 2024).”
From Still Waters, Rapid Currents: Early Labor Market Transformation under Generative AI (2025) · cites this paper as Feigenbaum and Gross, 2024
Cites
Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods
Callaway, B., & Sant’Anna, P. H. C. (2021) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001 · Cited by 9,126 · see citing works
Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design
Rivkin, J. W., & Siggelkow, N. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.3.290.12740 · Cited by 900 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Still Waters, Rapid Currents: Early Labor Market Transformation under Generative AI
Humlum, A., & Vestergaard, E. (2025) · doi:10.3386/w33777 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Feigenbaum, J., & Gross, D. P.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gross, Daniel P.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2024-12
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 8520-8540
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W4392191201
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
- Keywords
- automation, AT&T, telephone operators, organizational inertia, technology diffusion, organizational change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review