The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (genAI) is a potentially important new technology, but its impact on the economy depends on the speed and intensity of adoption. This paper reports results from a series of nationally representative U.S. surveys of genAI use at work and at home. As of late 2024, 45% of the U.S. population age 18–64 uses genAI. Among employed respondents, 27% used genAI for work at least once in the previous week: 10% used it every workday and 17% on some but not all workdays. Relative to each technology’s first mass-market product launch, work adoption of genAI has been faster than the personal computer (PC), and overall adoption has outpaced both PCs and the internet by an even wider margin. Between 1% and 7% of all work hours are currently assisted by genAI, and respondents report time savings equivalent to 1.4% of total work hours. Potential productivity gains vary widely by industry, and firm climate and policies play an important role in adoption patterns. This paper was accepted by Alfonso Gambardella, business strategy. Funding: This work was supported by the Walmart Foundation [Grant 252882]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.02523 .
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 34 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Bick, A., Blandin, A., & Deming, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (US)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Deming, David J.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2026-10
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 8440-8456
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W7124974472
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48
- FWCI
- 162.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- generative AI, technology adoption, time savings, productivity improvement, internet adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review