The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effects of Brand Loyalty on Competitive Price Promotional Strategies
Abstract
This paper analyzes the role played by brand loyalty in determining optimal price promotional strategies used by firms in a competitive setting. (Loyalty is operationalized as the minimum price differential needed before consumers who prefer one brand switch to another brand.) Our objective is to examine how loyalties toward the competing brands influence whether or not firms would use price promotions in a product category. We also examine how loyalty differences lead to variations in the depth and frequency with which price discounts are offered across brands in the same product category. The analysis predicts that a brand's likelihood of using price promotions increases with an increase in the number of competing brands in a product category. In the context of a market in which a brand with a large brand loyalty competes with a brand with a low brand loyalty, it is shown that in equilibrium, the stronger brand (i.e., the brand with the larger loyalty) promotes less frequently than the weaker brand. The results suggest that the weaker brand gains more from price promotions. The analysis helps us understand discounting patterns in markets where store brands, weak national brands, or newly introduced national brands compete against strong, well known, national brands. The findings are based on the unique perfect equilibrium in a finitely repeated game. The predictions of the model are compared with the data on 27 different product categories. The data are consistent with the main findings of the model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience
Fornell, C. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252129 · Cited by 5,641
On the relationship between perceived service quality, service loyalty and switching costs
de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Bloemer, J. (1998) · International Journal of Service Industry Management · doi:10.1108/09564239810238848 · Cited by 564
Content or Community? A Digital Business Strategy for Content Providers in the Social Age1
Oestreicher-Singer, G., & Zalmanson, L. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.12 · Cited by 422
Willing to Pay More, Eager to Pay Less: The Role of Customer Loyalty in Price Negotiations
Wieseke, J., Alavi, S., & Habel, J. (2014) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.13.0104 · Cited by 149
Personalized pricing and advertising: Who are the winners?
Esteves, R.-B., & Resende, J. (2019) · International Journal of Industrial Organization · doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2018.11.003 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Raju, J. S., Srinivasan, V., & Lal, R.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 276-304
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W1976764067
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.