The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A New Look at the Returns and Risks to Pharmaceutical R&D
Open accessAbstract
This study investigates the returns to R&D for 100 new drugs introduced into the United States during the decade of the 1970s. In contrast to prior studies, it incorporates several significant structural changes that have occurred in the pharmaceutical industry during the 1980s. These include higher real drug prices and a greater degree of generic competition. A major finding is that the return on R&D for the average new drug is approximately equal to the 9 percent industry cost of capital. However, the performance of new drugs introduced during the latter half of the 1970s was markedly better than that of early 1970s introductions. This latter finding is consistent with the more rapid rate of industry growth in real R&D expenditures. The study also finds that the variation in returns is highly skewed, with only the top 30 drugs covering mean R&D costs on a fully allocated basis. Finally, it is shown that real drug price increases in the 1980s were necessary for the average new drug introduction to recover its R&D costs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs
DiMasi, J. A., Hansen, R. W., & Grabowski, H. G. (2003) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00126-1 · Cited by 4,265
Self-citationDiagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency
Scannell, J. W., Blanckley, A., Boldon, H., & Warrington, B. (2012) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3681 · Cited by 1,981
Metadata
- Authors
- Grabowski, H., & Vernon, J.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1990-07
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 804-821
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2109013242
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Look at the Returns and Risks to Pharmaceutical R&D. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.36.7.804
- The paper
- Grabowski, H., & Vernon, J. (1990). A New Look at the Returns and Risks to Pharmaceutical R&D. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.7.804
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.