The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maximum Likelihood, Consistency and Data Envelopment Analysis: A Statistical Foundation
Abstract
This paper provides a formal statistical basis for the efficiency evaluation techniques of data envelopment analysis (DEA). DEA estimators of the best practice monotone increasing and concave production function are shown to be also maximum likelihood estimators if the deviation of actual output from the efficient output is regarded as a stochastic variable with a monotone decreasing probability density function. While the best practice frontier estimator is biased below the theoretical frontier for a finite sample size, the bias approaches zero for large samples. The DEA estimators exhibit the desirable asymptotic property of consistency, and the asymptotic distribution of the DEA estimators of inefficiency deviations is identical to the true distribution of these deviations. This result is then employed to suggest possible statistical tests of hypotheses based on asymptotic distributions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum likelihood estimation of econometric frontier functions
Greene, W. H. (1980) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(80)90041-x · Cited by 704
Cited by
Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses
McDonald, J. (2009) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.039 · Cited by 734
Estimation and Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: Recent Developments and Perspectives
Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2013) · Foundations and Trends in Econometrics · doi:10.1561/0800000020 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Banker, R. D.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1993-10
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1265-1273
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2142947888
- Cited by
- 899
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximum Likelihood, Consistency and Data Envelopment Analysis: A Statistical Foundation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1265
- The paper
- Banker, R. D. (1993). Maximum Likelihood, Consistency and Data Envelopment Analysis: A Statistical Foundation. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1265
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.