The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tight Approximation Algorithms for Maximum Separable Assignment Problems
Abstract
A separable assignment problem (SAP) is defined by a set of bins and a set of items to pack in each bin; a value, fij, for assigning item j to bin i; and a separate packing constraint for each bin—i.e., for each bin, a family of subsets of items that fit in to that bin. The goal is to pack items into bins to maximize the aggregate value. This class of problems includes the maximum generalized assignment problem (GAP)1 and a distributed caching problem (DCP) described in this paper. Given a β-approximation algorithm for finding the highest value packing of a single bin, we give A polynomial-time LP-rounding based ((1 − 1/e)β)-approximation algorithm. A simple polynomial-time local search (β/(β + 1) − ε)-approximation algorithm, for any ε > 0. Therefore, for all examples of SAP that admit an approximation scheme for the single-bin problem, we obtain an LP-based algorithm with (1 − 1/e − ε)-approximation and a local search algorithm with (½ - ε)-approximation guarantee. Furthermore, for cases in which the subproblem admits a fully polynomial approximation scheme (such as for GAP), the LP-based algorithm analysis can be strengthened to give a guarantee of 1 − 1/e. The best previously known approximation algorithm for GAP is a ½-approximation by Shmoys and Tardos and Chekuri and Khanna. Our LP algorithm is based on rounding a new linear programming relaxation, with a provably better integrality gap. To complement these results, we show that SAP and DCP cannot be approximated withi…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Maximum separable assignment supplies stronger configuration-LP guarantees for the requester-side separable special case.
“Maximum separable assignment [10] supplies stronger configuration-LP guarantees for the requester-side separable special case.”
From PrefixPlace: Provable Prefix Key-Value Placement for Large Language Model Serving under Heterogeneous Compute and Transfer Costs (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
Configuration methods based on Linear Programming (LP) give stronger worst-case factors for the requester-side separable special case.
“Configuration methods based on Linear Programming (LP) give stronger worst-case factors for the requester-side separable special case [10].”
From PrefixPlace: Provable Prefix Key-Value Placement for Large Language Model Serving under Heterogeneous Compute and Transfer Costs (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions—II
Fisher, M. L., Nemhauser, G. L., & Wolsey, L. A. (1978) · Mathematical Programming Studies · doi:10.1007/bfb0121195 · Cited by 589
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.1023/B:JOCO.0000038913.96607.c2 · DOI
- Andelman N., 2004, Proc. 9th Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory (SWAT), 26
- Baev I. D., 2001, Proc. 12th ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 661
- 10.1137/080715421 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.orl.2005.05.006 · DOI
- Calinescu G., 2010, SIAM J. Comput.
- 10.1002/rsa.10033 · DOI
- Chakrabarty D., 2008, Proc. 49th Annual IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (FOCS), 687
- Chekuri C., 2000, Proc. 11th ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 213
- 10.1145/285055.285059 · DOI
- Feige U., SIAM J. Comput., 32, 172, 10.1137/S0097539700380754 · DOI
- Feige U., 2006, Proc. 47th Annual IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (FOCS)
- Fleischer L., Proc. 16th Annual ACM/SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 611
- Garg N., 1998, Proc. 39th Annual IEEE Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci., 300
- Garg R., 2001, Proc. 4th Internat. Workshop on Approximation Algorithms for Combin. Optim. Problems (APPROX)
- Goemans M. X., SIAM J. Discrete Math., 7, 656, 10.1137/S0895480192243516 · DOI
- Gomes C., 2003, Proc. 14th ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SODA)
- Jain K., 2003, Proc. 14th ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 266
- Jansen K., 2004, Proc. 15th ACM-SIAM Symp. Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 204
- Mirrokni V. S., 2005, Approximation Algorithms for Distributed and Selfish Agents
- 10.1007/BF01202286 · DOI
- 10.1287/moor.20.2.257 · DOI
- Shachnai H., 2003, Proc. 6th Internat. Workshop on Approximation Algorithms for Combinat. Optim. Problems (APPROX), 167
- 10.1007/BF01585178 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-6377(03)00062-2 · DOI
- Vondrák J., 2008, Proc. 4th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (STOC), 67
- Young N., 1996, Proc. 7th ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 170
- 10.1109/SFCS.2001.959930 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Fleischer, L., Goemans, M. X., Mirrokni, V. S., & Sviridenko, M.
- Affiliations
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Google (United States) (US)
- IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center (US)
- ORCID
- Mirrokni, Vahab S.
- Venue
- Mathematics of Operations Research
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 416-431
- ISSN
- 0364-765X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5471
- OpenAlex
- W2054428995
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mathematics of Operations Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Optimization and Packing Problems
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Theoretical Computer Science › Optimization and Search Problems
- Keywords
- LP rounding, local search, approximation algorithms, integrality gap, hardness of approximation, combinatorial auctions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review