Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 667

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints: Stationarity, Optimality, and Sensitivity

Scheel, Holger, Scholtes, Stefan·2000·Mathematics of Operations Research

Abstract

We study mathematical programs with complementarity constraints. Several stationarity concepts, based on a piecewise smooth formulation, are presented and compared. The concepts are related to stationarity conditions for certain smooth programs as well as to stationarity concepts for a nonsmooth exact penalty function. Further, we present Fiacco-McCormick type second order optimality conditions and an extension of the stability results of Robinson and Kojima to mathematical programs with complementarity constraints.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/moor.25.1.1.15213

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 667

Metadata

Authors
Scheel, H., & Scholtes, S.
Venue
Mathematics of Operations Research
Published
2000-02
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
1-22
ISSN
  • 0364-765X (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5471
OpenAlex
W2037678919
Cited by
667
References
0
FWCI
9.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints: Stationarity, Optimality, and Sensitivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/moor.25.1.1.15213
The paper
Scheel, H., & Scholtes, S. (2000). Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints: Stationarity, Optimality, and Sensitivity. Mathematics of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.25.1.1.15213

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.