The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mathematical Properties of the Banzhaf Power Index
Abstract
The Banzhaf index of power in a voting situation depends on the number of ways in which each voter can effect a “swing” in the outcome. It is comparable—but not actually equivalent—to the better-known Shapley-Shubik index, which depends on the number of alignments or “orders of support” in which each voter is pivotal. This paper investigates some properties of the Banzhaf index, the main topics being its derivation from axioms and its behavior in weighted-voting models when the number of small voters tends to infinity. These matters have previously been studied from the Shapley-Shubik viewpoint, but the present work reveals some striking differences between the two indices. The paper also attempts to promote better communication and less duplication of mathematical effort by identifying and describing several other theories, formally equivalent to Banzhaf’s, that are found in fields ranging from sociology to electrical engineering. An extensive bibliography is provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Probability Inequalities for sums of Bounded Random Variables
Hoeffding, W. (1994) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0865-5_26 · Cited by 6,666
Shapley, L. S. (1988) · The Shapley Value · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511528446.003 · Cited by 4,954
Self-citationFord, D. R., & Fulkerson, D. R. (1962) · Cited by 4,072
Dahl, R. A. (2007) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830020303 · Cited by 3,863
A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System
Shapley, L. S., & Shubik, M. (1954) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1951053 · Cited by 2,162
Self-citationAn Introduction to Positive Political Theory
Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 972
Aumann, R. J., & Shapley, L. S. (2015) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400867080 · Cited by 742
Self-citationBrams, S. J. (1975) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 533
Decision-Rules and Individual Values in Constitutional Choice
Rae, D. W. (1969) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055400261467 · Cited by 442
Probability models of collective decision making
Niemi, R. G., & Weisberg, H. F. (1972) · Merrill eBooks · Cited by 286
Cited by
Data Quality and Explainable AI
Bertossi, L., & Geerts, F. (2020) · Journal of Data and Information Quality · doi:10.1145/3386687 · Cited by 51
LS-Tree: Model Interpretation When the Data Are Linguistic
Chen, J., & Jordan, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5749 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Dubey, P., & Shapley, L. S.
- Venue
- Mathematics of Operations Research
- Published
- 1979-05
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 99-131
- ISSN
- 0364-765X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5471
- OpenAlex
- W1977911709
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 24.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mathematical Properties of the Banzhaf Power Index. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/moor.4.2.99
- The paper
- Dubey, P., & Shapley, L. S. (1979). Mathematical Properties of the Banzhaf Power Index. Mathematics of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.4.2.99
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.