Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,997

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Branch-and-Bound Methods: A Survey

Lawler, E. L., Wood, D. E.·1966·Operations Research

Abstract

The essential features of the branch-and-bound approach to constrained optimization are described, and several specific applications are reviewed. These include integer linear programming (Land-Doig and Balas methods), nonlinear programming (minimization of nonconvex objective functions), the traveling-salesman problem (Eastman and Little, et al. methods), and the quadratic assignment problem (Gilmore and Lawler methods). Computational considerations, including trade-offs between length of computation and storage requirements, are discussed and a comparison with dynamic programming is made. Various applications outside the domain of mathematical programming are also mentioned.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/opre.14.4.699

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,997

Metadata

Authors
Lawler, E. L., & Wood, D. E.
Venue
Operations Research
Published
1966-08
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
699-719
ISSN
  • 0030-364X (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5463
OpenAlex
W2144931885
Cited by
1,997
References
0
FWCI
19.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Branch-and-Bound Methods: A Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/opre.14.4.699
The paper
Lawler, E. L., & Wood, D. E. (1966). Branch-and-Bound Methods: A Survey. Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.14.4.699

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.