The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis Via Linear Programming
Abstract
Two medical applications of linear programming are described in this paper. Specifically, linear programming-based machine learning techniques are used to increase the accuracy and objectivity of breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis. The first application to breast cancer diagnosis utilizes characteristics of individual cells, obtained from a minimally invasive fine needle aspirate, to discriminate benign from malignant breast lumps. This allows an accurate diagnosis without the need for a surgical biopsy. The diagnostic system in current operation at University of Wisconsin Hospitals was trained on samples from 569 patients and has had 100% chronological correctness in diagnosing 131 subsequent patients. The second application, recently put into clinical practice, is a method that constructs a surface that predicts when breast cancer is likely to recur in patients that have had their cancers excised. This gives the physician and the patient better information with which to plan treatment, and may eliminate the need for a prognostic surgical procedure. The novel feature of the predictive approach is the ability to handle cases for which cancer has not recurred (censored data) as well as cases for which cancer has recurred at a specific time. The prognostic system has an expected error of 13.9 to 18.3 months, which is better than prognosis correctness by other available techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Comparative Evaluation of Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Algorithms for Multivariate Data
Goldstein, M., & Uchida, S. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152173 · Cited by 1,032
A fully integrated reprogrammable memristor–CMOS system for efficient multiply–accumulate operations
Cai, F., Correll, J. M., Lee, S. H., Lim, Y., Bothra, V., Zhang, Z., Flynn, M. P., & Lu, W. D. (2019) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-019-0270-x · Cited by 728
Sexton, R. S., Dorsey, R. E., & Johnson, J. D. (1999) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00114-3 · Cited by 235
Active learning for biomedical citation screening
Wallace, B. C., Small, K., Brodley, C. E., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2010) · Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1835804.1835829 · Cited by 123
A Survey of Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Privacy Protection in the Internet of Things
Rodríguez, E., Otero, B., & Canal, R. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23031252 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Mangasarian, O. L., Street, W. N., & Wolberg, W. H.
- Venue
- Operations Research
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 570-577
- ISSN
- 0030-364X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5463
- OpenAlex
- W2014374971
- Cited by
- 843
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis Via Linear Programming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/opre.43.4.570
- The paper
- Mangasarian, O. L., Street, W. N., & Wolberg, W. H. (1995). Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis Via Linear Programming. Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.43.4.570
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.