The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inventory Competition Under Dynamic Consumer Choice
Abstract
We analyze a model of inventory competition among n firms that provide competing, substitutable goods. Each firm chooses initial inventory levels for their good in a single period (newsboy-like) inventory model. Customers choose dynamically based on current availability, so the inventory levels at one firm affect the demand of all competing firms. This creates a strategic interaction among the firms' inventory decisions. Our work extends earlier work on variations of this problem by Karjalainen (1992), Lippman and McCardle (1997) and Parlar (1988). Specifically, we model demand in a more realistic way as a stochastic sequence of heterogeneous consumers who choose dynamically from among the available goods (or choose not to purchase) based on a utility maximization criterion. We also use a sample path analysis, so minimal assumptions are imposed on this demand process. We characterize the Nash equilibrium of the resulting stocking game and prove it is unique in the symmetric case. We show there is a bias toward overstocking caused by competition; specifically, reducing the quantity stocked at any equilibrium of the game increases total system profits, and at any joint-optimal set of stocking levels, each firm has an individual incentive to increase its own stock. For the symmetric case, we show that as the number of competing firms increases, the overstocking becomes so severe that total system (and individual firm) profits approach zero. Finally, we propose a stochastic gradient algorithm for computing equilibria and provide several numerical examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Supply Chain Coordination with Contracts
Cachon, G. P. (2003) · Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science · doi:10.1016/s0927-0507(03)11006-7 · Cited by 2,683
Game Theory in Supply Chain Analysis
Cachon, G. P., & Netessine, S. (2004) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-7953-5_2 · Cited by 567
Centralized and Competitive Inventory Models with Demand Substitution
Netessine, S., & Rudi, N. (2003) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.51.2.329.12788 · Cited by 435
Note: The Newsvendor Model with Endogenous Demand
Dana, J. D., & Petruzzi, N. C. (2001) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.11.1488.10252 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahajan, S., & van Ryzin, G.
- Venue
- Operations Research
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 646-657
- ISSN
- 0030-364X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5463
- OpenAlex
- W2121918661
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inventory Competition Under Dynamic Consumer Choice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/opre.49.5.646.10603
- The paper
- Mahajan, S., & van Ryzin, G. (2001). Inventory Competition Under Dynamic Consumer Choice. Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.49.5.646.10603
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.