The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decomposition Principle for Linear Programs
Abstract
A technique is presented for the decomposition of a linear program that permits the problem to be solved by alternate solutions of linear sub-programs representing its several parts and a coordinating program that is obtained from the parts by linear transformations. The coordinating program generates at each cycle new objective forms for each part, and each part generates in turn (from its optimal basic feasible solutions) new activities (columns) for the interconnecting program. Viewed as an instance of a “generalized programming problem” whose columns are drawn freely from given convex sets, such a problem can be studied by an appropriate generalization of the duality theorem for linear programming, which permits a sharp distinction to be made between those constraints that pertain only to a part of the problem and those that connect its parts. This leads to a generalization of the Simplex Algorithm, for which the decomposition procedure becomes a special case. Besides holding promise for the efficient computation of large-scale systems, the principle yields a certain rationale for the “decentralized decision process” in the theory of the firm. Formally the prices generated by the coordinating program cause the manager of each part to look for a “pure” sub-program analogue of pure strategy in game theory, which he proposes to the coordinator as best he can do. The coordinator finds the optimum “mix” of pure sub-programs (using new proposals and earlier ones) consistent with over-all demands and supply, and thereby generates new prices that again generates new proposals by each of the parts, etc. The iterative process is finite.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., & Eckstein, J. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000016 · Cited by 17,075
Parikh, N., & Boyd, S. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Optimization · doi:10.1561/2400000003 · Cited by 4,102
Branch-and-price: column generation for solving huge integer programs
Barnhart, C., Johnson, E. L., Nemhauser, G. L., Savelsbergh, M. W. P., & Vance, P. H. (1998) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.46.3.316 · Cited by 2,219
Challenges and opportunities in quantum optimization
Abbas, A., Ambainis, A., Augustino, B., Bärtschi, A., Buhrman, H., Coffrin, C., Cortiana, G., Dunjko, V., Egger, D. J., Elmegreen, B. G., et al. (2024) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00770-9 · Cited by 201
“133).”
A technical review of column generation in integer programming
Wilhelm, W. E. (2001) · Optimization and Engineering · doi:10.1023/a:1013141227104 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Dantzig, G. B., & Wolfe, P.
- Venue
- Operations Research
- Published
- 1960-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-111
- ISSN
- 0030-364X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5463
- OpenAlex
- W2105560970
- Cited by
- 2,315
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decomposition Principle for Linear Programs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/opre.8.1.101
- The paper
- Dantzig, G. B., & Wolfe, P. (1960). Decomposition Principle for Linear Programs. Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.8.1.101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.