Cited by 680Social Capital and NetworksEducational Leadership and PracticesParental Involvement in Education

Social Capital and Organizational Performance: Evidence from Urban Public Schools

Leana, Carrie R., Pil, Frits K.·2006·Organization Science

Abstract

In this paper we examine social capital and its relationship with performance at the organizational level. We predict that both internal and external social capital will have a positive effect on organizational performance. We test our hypotheses in 88 urban public schools where we collected data from principals, teachers, parents, and students. Results indicate that both internal social capital (relations among teachers) and external social capital (relations between the principal and external stakeholders) predict student achievement in mathematics and reading. These effects were sustained over time for reading achievement, providing support for a causal relationship between social capital and performance. We provide evidence that social capital’s impact on student achievement in math—but not reading—is mediated by the quality of instruction provided by teachers. These results underscore the importance of context in studies of social capital.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.1060.0191

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both internal social capital (relations among teachers) and external social capital (relations between the principal and outside stakeholders) predict school performance.

    “Leana and Pil (2006) demonstrated that both internal social capital (relations among teachers) and external social capital (relations between the principal and outside stakeholders) predict school performance”
  • The study's central contribution is to insert a missing step into the conventional account of social capital and schools: the evidence supports a longer causal chain-social capital → activation mechanism → organizational capacity → improvement-rather than a direct link from social capital to improvement.

    “Where the standard claim runs directly from social capital to improvement (Leana & Pil, 2006; Pil & Leana, 2009), the evidence here supports a longer causal chain: social capital → activation mechanism → organizational capacity → improvement.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leana, C. R., & Pil, F. K.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Organization Science
Published
2006-06
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
353-366
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
OpenAlex
W2155711245
Cited by
680
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 31
FWCI
45.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
Keywords
social capital, organizational performance, urban public schools, internal social capital, external social capital, academic performance, mathematics achievement, reading achievement, teacher quality, teacher relationships, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review