Knowing where you stand: Physical isolation, perceived respect, and organizational identification among virtual employees
Abstract
This research investigates the relationship between virtual employees' degree of physical isolation and their perceived respect in the organization. Respect is an identity-based status perception that reflects the extent to which one is included and valued as a member of the organization. We hypothesize that the degree of physical isolation is negatively associated with virtual employees' perceived respect and that this relationship explains the lower organizational identification among more physically isolated virtual employees. In two field studies using survey methods, we find that perceived respect is negatively associated with the degree of physical isolation, and respect mediates the relationship between physical isolation and organizational identification. These effects hold for shorter- and longer-tenured employees alike. Our research contributes to the virtual work literature by drawing attention to physical isolation and the important but neglected role of status perceptions in shaping virtual employees' organizational identification. We also contribute to the literature on perceived respect by demonstrating how respect is affected by the physical context of work.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social distancing in remote work settings may be beneficial to employees on the spectrum who seek less intensive interpersonal communication, but may also inadvertently limit opportunities to learn from other coworkers.
“Similarly, while social distancing [37,38] in remote work settings may be beneficial to employees on the spectrum who seek less intensive interpersonal communication, they may also inadvertently limit opportunities to learn from other coworkers [17].”
From Remote work support needs of employees with autism spectrum disorder in Poland: perspectives of individuals with autism and their coworkers (2022) · cites this paper as [38]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 331
- Authors
- Bartel, C. A., Wrzesniewski, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Yale University (US)
- New York University (US)
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 743-757
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2166954820
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 27.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Texas at Austin
- Yale School of Management
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- physical isolation, perceived respect, organizational identification, status perception, remote work, employee inclusion, tenure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review