The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reproducing Knowledge: Replication Without Imitation at Moderate Complexity
Abstract
The complexity of a firm's strategy affects both the ease with which the firm can replicate the strategy in a new setting and the ease with which rivals can imitate it. Simple strategies are as readily imitated as replicated, and highly intricate strategies resist imitation and replication equally. At moderate levels of complexity, however, a wedge develops between the ease of replication and the difficulty of imitation, so long as the replicator has better information than the imitator about the original success. An agent-based simulation model clarifies the structural reasons that this is so. The model also shows how the wedge-maximizing level of complexity varies with the replicator's informational edge over the imitator. The results help to pinpoint situations in which strategies requiring replication are likely to defy imitation and generate sustained competitive advantage. More generally, the analysis sheds light on the value of superior but imperfect information about good solutions to hard problems. Finally, the results suggest that a pattern long observed by organization scholars--that “loosely coupled organizations” are especially effective competitors--may arise for a very different reason than is normally posited.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375 · Cited by 5,649
Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How
Teece, D. J. (1977) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232084 · Cited by 1,464
Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x · Cited by 1,410
Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data
Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2001) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00135-9 · Cited by 1,315
Horgan, J. (1995) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0695-104 · Cited by 407
Cited by
Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design
Rivkin, J. W., & Siggelkow, N. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.3.290.12740 · Cited by 900
Self-citationSpeed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity
Siggelkow, N., & Rivkin, J. W. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0116 · Cited by 734
Self-citationSiggelkow, N., & Levinthal, D. A. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.650.24870 · Cited by 953
Kapoor, R., & Agarwal, S. (2017) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1122 · Cited by 453
Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogeneity
Gary, M. S., & Wood, R. E. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.899 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Rivkin, J. W.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 274-293
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2164170887
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 35.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproducing Knowledge: Replication Without Imitation at Moderate Complexity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.12.3.274.10106
- The paper
- Rivkin, J. W. (2001). Reproducing Knowledge: Replication Without Imitation at Moderate Complexity. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.3.274.10106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.