The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pedestrian Behavior at Bottlenecks
Abstract
Traffic operations in public walking spaces are to a large extent determined by differences in pedestrian traffic demand and infrastructure supply. Congestion occurs when pedestrian traffic demand exceeds the capacity. In turn, the latter is determined by a number of factors, such as the width of the bottleneck and the wall surface, as well as the interaction behavior of the pedestrians passing the bottleneck. This article discusses experimental findings of microscopic pedestrian behavior in case of bottlenecks. Results for both a narrow bottleneck and a wide bottleneck are discussed and compared to the results of an experiment without a bottleneck. It is shown how pedestrians inside bottlenecks effectively form layers or trails, the distance between which is approximately 45 cm. This is less than the effective width of a single pedestrian, which is around 55 cm. The layers are thus overlapping, a phenomenon which is referred to as the “zipper” effect. The pedestrians within these layers follow each other at 1.3 seconds, irrespective of the considered experiment. For the narrow bottleneck case (width of one meter) two layers are formed; for the wide bottleneck case (width of two meters), four or five layers are formed, although the life span of these layers is rather small. The zipper effect causes the capacity of the bottleneck to increase in a stepwise fashion with the width of the bottleneck, at least for bottlenecks of moderate width (less than 3 m). This has substantial implications for the design of walking facilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Relations in Public. Microstudies of the Public Order
Dellwing, M. (2022) · Goffman-Handbuch · doi:10.1007/978-3-476-05871-3_44 · Cited by 2,118
Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics
Schreckenberg, M., & Sharma, S. D. (2002) · Springer eBooks · Cited by 1,018
Cellular automata microsimulation for modeling bi-directional pedestrian walkways
Blue, V. J., & Adler, J. L. (2001) · Transportation Research Part B: Methodological · doi:10.1016/s0191-2615(99)00052-1 · Cited by 703
Experimental Research of Pedestrian Walking Behavior
Daamen, W., & Hoogendoorn, S. P. (2003) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/1828-03 · Cited by 338
Self-citationWeidmann, U. (1992) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-a-000687810 · Cited by 171
Donald, I. (1995) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/0925-7535(95)90077-2 · Cited by 145
Beauty is Power: The Use of Space on the Sidewalk
Dabbs, J. M., & Stokes, N. A. (1975) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/2786367 · Cited by 84
Normative Pedestrian Behaviour Theory and Modelling
Hoogendoorn, S. P., & Bovy, P. H. L. (2002) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/9780585474601-012 · Cited by 53
Self-citationDeterminants of Nonstationary Personal Space Invasion
Sobel, R. S., & Lillith, N. (1975) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1975.9923310 · Cited by 39
Cited by
The Walking Behaviour of Pedestrian Social Groups and Its Impact on Crowd Dynamics
Moussaïd, M., Perozo, N., Garnier, S., Helbing, D., & Theraulaz, G. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010047 · Cited by 1,120
Saving Human Lives: What Complexity Science and Information Systems can Contribute
Helbing, D., Brockmann, D., Chadefaux, T., Donnay, K., Blanke, U., Woolley-Meza, O., Moussaid, M., Johansson, A., Krause, J., Schutte, S., et al. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10955-014-1024-9 · Cited by 615
The fundamental diagram of pedestrian movement revisited
Seyfried, A., Steffen, B., Klingsch, W., & Boltes, M. (2005) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2005/10/p10002 · Cited by 503
Transitions in pedestrian fundamental diagrams of straight corridors and T-junctions
Zhang, J., Klingsch, W., Schadschneider, A., & Seyfried, A. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2011/06/p06004 · Cited by 419
Evacuation Dynamics: Empirical Results, Modeling and Applications
Schadschneider, A., Klingsch, W., Klüpfel, H., Kretz, T., Rogsch, C., & Seyfried, A. (2009) · Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_187 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoogendoorn, S. P., & Daamen, W.
- Venue
- Transportation Science
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-159
- ISSN
- 0041-1655 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5447
- OpenAlex
- W2038587098
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 24.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pedestrian Behavior at Bottlenecks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/trsc.1040.0102
- The paper
- Hoogendoorn, S. P., & Daamen, W. (2005). Pedestrian Behavior at Bottlenecks. Transportation Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1040.0102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.