Cited by 240Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies

Disposition of orally administered 2,2-Bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)propane (Bisphenol A) in pregnant rats and the placental transfer to fetuses.

Open access
Takahashi, O, Oishi, S·2000·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

We studied the disposition of bisphenol A (BPA) in pregnant female F344/DuCrj(Fischer) rats and its placental transfer to fetuses after a single oral administration of 1 g/kg BPA dissolved in propylene glycol. BPA in maternal blood, liver, and kidney reached maximal concentrations (14.7, 171, and 36 microg/g) 20 min after the administration and gradually decreased. The levels were 2-5% of the maximum 6 hr after the administration. The maximal concentration of BPA in fetuses (9 microg/g) was also attained 20 min after the administration. BPA levels then gradually reduced in a similar manner to maternal blood. These results suggest that the absorption and distribution of BPA in maternal organs and fetuses are extremely rapid and that the placenta does not act as a barrier to BPA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.00108931

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 240

Authors
Takahashi, O., & Oishi, S.
Affiliations
Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health (JP)
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
2000-10-01
Volume
108
Issue
10
Pages
931-935
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W2114926342
Cited by
240
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Keywords
bisphenol A, placental transfer, prenatal exposure, maternal-fetal transfer, pharmacokinetics, oral administration, pregnancy, placental barrier, tissue distribution, F344 rats
MeSH terms
Absorption, Bisphenol A Compounds, Administration, Oral, Air Pollutants, Occupational, Animals, Benzhydryl Compounds, Female, Maternal-Fetal Exchange, Phenols, Placenta, Pregnancy, Rats, Inbred F344, Time Factors, Tissue Distribution, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review