The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals.
Open accessAbstract
We present a model of the distribution of noise annoyance with the mean varying as a function of the noise exposure. Day-night level (DNL) and day-evening-night level (DENL) were used as noise descriptors. Because the entire annoyance distribution has been modeled, any annoyance measure that summarizes this distribution can be calculated from the model. We fitted the model to data from noise annoyance studies for aircraft, road traffic, and railways separately. Polynomial approximations of relationships implied by the model for the combinations of the following exposure and annoyance measures are presented: DNL or DENL, and percentage "highly annoyed" (cutoff at 72 on a scale of 0-100), percentage "annoyed" (cutoff at 50 on a scale of 0-100), or percentage (at least) "a little annoyed" (cutoff at 28 on a scale of 0-100). These approximations are very good, and they are easier to use for practical calculations than the model itself, because the model involves a normal distribution. Our results are based on the same data set that was used earlier to establish relationships between DNL and percentage highly annoyed. In this paper we provide better estimates of the confidence intervals due to the improved model of the relationship between annoyance and noise exposure. Moreover, relationships using descriptors other than DNL and percentage highly annoyed, which are presented here, have not been established earlier on the basis of a large dataset.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
de Nazelle, A., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Antó, J. M., Brauer, M., Briggs, D., Braun-Fahrlander, C., Cavill, N., Cooper, A. R., Desqueyroux, H., Fruin, S., et al. (2011) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2011.02.003 · Cited by 622
The quantitative relationship between road traffic noise and hypertension: a meta-analysis
van Kempen, E., & Babisch, W. (2012) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0b013e328352ac54 · Cited by 414
The Adverse Effects of Environmental Noise Exposure on Oxidative Stress and Cardiovascular Risk
Münzel, T., Sørensen, M., Schmidt, F., Schmidt, E., Steven, S., Kröller-Schön, S., & Daiber, A. (2018) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2017.7118 · Cited by 283
The effect of transportation noise on health and cognitive development: a review of recent evidence
Clark, C., & Stansfeld, S. A. (2007) · International Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.46867/ijcp.2007.20.02.10 · Cited by 112
Human and policy dimensions of soundscape ecology
Smith, J. W., & Pijanowski, B. C. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.007 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Miedema, H. M., & Oudshoorn, C. G.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 409-416
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2061521761
- Cited by
- 899
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.01109409
- The paper
- Miedema, H. M., & Oudshoorn, C. G. (2001). Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.