The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Inland China, Rice, Rather than Fish, Is the Major Pathway for Methylmercury Exposure
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Fish consumption is considered the primary pathway of methylmercury (MeHg) exposure for most people in the world. However, in the inland regions of China, most of the residents eat little fish, but they live in areas where a significant amount of mercury (Hg) is present in the environment. OBJECTIVES: We assessed concentrations of total Hg and MeHg in samples of water, air, agricultural products, and other exposure media to determine the main exposure pathway of Hg in populations in inland China. METHODS: We selected Guizhou Province for our study because it is highly contaminated with Hg and therefore is representative of other Hg-contaminated areas in China. We selected four study locations in Guizhou Province: three that represent typical environments with severe Hg pollution [due to Hg mining and smelting (Wanshan), traditional zinc smelting (recently closed; Weining), and heavy coal-based industry (Qingzhen)], and a village in a remote nature reserve (Leigong). RESULTS: The probable daily intake (PDI) of MeHg for an adult population based on 60 kg body weight (bw) was considerably higher in Wanshan than in the other three locations. With an average PDI of 0.096 microg/kg bw/day (range, 0.015-0.45 microg/kg bw/day), approximately 34% of the inhabitants in Wanshan exceeded the reference dose of 0.1 microg/kg bw/day established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The PDI of MeHg for residents in the three other locations were all well below 0.1 microg/kg bw/day (averages from 0.017 to 0.023 microg/kg bw/day, with a maximum of 0.095 microg/kg bw/day). In all four areas, rice consumption accounted for 94-96% of the PDI of MeHg. CONCLUSION: We found that rice consumption is by far the most important MeHg exposure route; however, most of the residents (except those in Hg-mining areas) have low PDIs of MeHg.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mercury Methylation by Novel Microorganisms from New Environments
Gilmour, C. C., Podar, M., Bullock, A. L., Graham, A. M., Brown, S. D., Somenahally, A. C., Johs, A., Hurt, R. A., Bailey, K. L., & Elias, D. A. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es403075t · Cited by 734
Plant mediated detoxification of mercury and lead
Kumar, B., Smita, K., & Cumbal Flores, L. (2017) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.08.010 · Cited by 209
Biochar and nitrate reduce risk of methylmercury in soils under straw amendment
Zhang, Y., Liu, Y.-R., Lei, P., Wang, Y.-J., & Zhong, H. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.106 · Cited by 73
Shu, R., Dang, F., & Zhong, H. (2016) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.037 · Cited by 68
The unintended consequences of a gluten-free diet
Bulka, C. M., Davis, M. A., Karagas, M. R., Ahsan, H., & Argos, M. (2017) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000640 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, H., Feng, X., Larssen, T., Qiu, G., & Vogt, R. D.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1183-1188
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2099440341
- Cited by
- 510
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Inland China, Rice, Rather than Fish, Is the Major Pathway for Methylmercury Exposure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.1001915
- The paper
- Zhang, H., Feng, X., Larssen, T., Qiu, G., & Vogt, R. D. (2010). In Inland China, Rice, Rather than Fish, Is the Major Pathway for Methylmercury Exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1001915
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.