The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nanotechnology: Looking As We Leap
Open accessAbstract
Since 1989, when IBM researchers whimsically demonstrated a scientific breakthrough by constructing a 35-atom depiction of the company’s logo, the ability to manipulate individual atoms has spawned a tidal wave of research and development at the nano (from the Greek word for “dwarf”) scale. Nanomaterials are defined as having at least one dimension of 100 nanometers or less—about the size of your average virus. Nanotechnology—the creation, manipulation, and application of materials at the nanoscale—involves the ability to engineer, control, and exploit the unique chemical, physical, and electrical properties that emerge from the infinitesimally tiny man-made particles. Nanoparticles behave like neither solids, liquids, nor gases, and exist in the topsy-turvy world of quantum physics, which governs those denizens small enough to have escaped the laws of Newtonian physics. This allows them to perform their almost magical feats of conductivity, reactivity, and optical sensitivity, among others. “That’s why nanomaterials are useful and interesting and so hot right now,” says Kristen Kulinowski, executive director for education and policy at the Rice University Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology (CBEN). “Being in this quantum regime enables new properties to emerge that are not possible or not exhibited by those same chemicals when they’re much smaller or much larger. These include different colors, electronic properties, magnetic properties, mechanical properties—depending on the particle, any or all of these can be altered at the nanoscale. That’s the power of nanotech.” Many observers not normally given to hyperbole are calling nanotechnology “the next Industrial Revolution.” The National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI), the interagency consortium overseeing the federal government’s widespread and well-funded nanotechnology activities, has predicted the field will be worth $1 trillion to the U.S. economy alone by 2015—or sooner. Clearly, nanotechnology is poised to become a major factor in the world’s economy and part of our everyday lives in the near future. The science of the very small is going to be very big, very soon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Toxicologic Review of Quantum Dots: Toxicity Depends on Physicochemical and Environmental Factors
Hardman, R. (2006) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.8284 · Cited by 2,303
Oberdörster, G., Maynard, A., Donaldson, K., Castranova, V., Fitzpatrick, J., Ausman, K., Carter, J., Karn, B., Kreyling, W., Lai, D., et al. (2005) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1743-8977-2-8 · Cited by 2,134
Donaldson, K., Aitken, R., Tran, L., Stone, V., Duffin, R., Forrest, G., & Alexander, A. (2006) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfj130 · Cited by 1,167
Hsin, Y.-H., Chen, C.-F., Huang, S., Shih, T.-S., Lai, P.-S., & Chueh, P. J. (2008) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.04.015 · Cited by 864
Silver nanoparticles induce cytotoxicity by a Trojan-horse type mechanism
Park, E.-J., Yi, J., Kim, Y., Choi, K., & Park, K. (2010) · Toxicology in Vitro · doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2009.12.001 · Cited by 746
Metadata
- Authors
- Hood, E.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- A740-A749
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2027763753
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanotechnology: Looking As We Leap. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.112-a740
- The paper
- Hood, E. (2004). Nanotechnology: Looking As We Leap. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.112-a740
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.