Particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, and daily mortality in Chongqing China
Open accessAbstract
In 1995, daily mortality in a district of Chongqing, China, was analyzed from January through December for associations with daily ambient sulfur dioxide and fine particles (airborne particles with diameters less than or equal to 2.5 microm; PM2.5. The mean concentration of PM2.5 was 147 microg/m3 (maximum, 666 microg/m3), and that of SO2 was 213 microg/m3 (maximum, 571 microg/m3). On average, 9.6 persons died each day. We used a generalized additive model using robust Poisson regression to estimate the associations of mean daily SO2 and PM2.5 with daily mortality (on the same day and at lags up to 5 days) adjusted for trend, season, temperature, humidity, and day of the week. The relative risk of mortality associated with a 100 microg/m3 increase in mean daily SO2 was highest on the second lag day [1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-1.09] and the third lag day (1.04; 95% CI, 0.99-1.08). The associations between daily mortality and mean daily PM2.5 were negative and statistically insignificant on all days. The relative risk of respiratory mortality on the second day after a 100 microg/m3 increase in mean daily SO2 was 1.11 (95% CI, 1.02-1.22), and that for cardiovascular mortality was 1.10 (95% CI, 1.02-1.20). The relative risk of cardiovascular mortality on the third day after a 100 microg/m3 increase in mean daily SO2 was 1.20 (95% CI, 1.11-1.30). The relative risks of mortality due to cancer and other causes were insignificant on both days. The estimated effects of mean daily SO2 on cardiovascular and respiratory mortality risk remained after controlling for PM2.5.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only one study examined the acute effect of PM2.5 on daily mortality in China.
“Only one study examined the acute effect of PM2.5 on daily mortality (Venners et al. 2003); however, that study was limited in duration (213 days) and the observed association was statistically insignificant.”
From Differentiating the effects of fine and coarse particles on daily mortality in Shanghai, China (2007) · cites this paper as Venners et al. 2003
The observed association in that study was statistically insignificant.
“Only one study examined the acute effect of PM2.5 on daily mortality (Venners et al. 2003); however, that study was limited in duration (213 days) and the observed association was statistically insignificant.”
From Differentiating the effects of fine and coarse particles on daily mortality in Shanghai, China (2007) · cites this paper as Venners et al. 2003
That study was limited in duration (213 days).
“Only one study examined the acute effect of PM2.5 on daily mortality (Venners et al. 2003); however, that study was limited in duration (213 days) and the observed association was statistically insignificant.”
From Differentiating the effects of fine and coarse particles on daily mortality in Shanghai, China (2007) · cites this paper as Venners et al. 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 173
- Authors
- Venners, S. A., Wang, B., Xu, Z., Schlatter, Y., Wang, L., & Xu, X.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-04-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 562-567
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- PMC
- PMC1241445
- OpenAlex
- W2054806718
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor, 5386 d)
- Locations
- Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- V. Kann Rasmussen Foundation
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES000002, ES 00002)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
- Keywords
- particulate matter, PM2.5, sulfur dioxide, air pollution, daily mortality, cardiovascular mortality, respiratory mortality, lagged effects, Chongqing
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Air Pollutants, Vehicle Emissions, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cause of Death, Child, Child, Preschool, China, Environmental Monitoring, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Meteorological Concepts, Middle Aged, Mortality, Particle Size, Seasons, Sulfur Dioxide, Risk Assessment, Epidemiological Monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review