The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organophosphorus pesticide exposure of urban and suburban preschool children with organic and conventional diets.
Open accessAbstract
We assessed organophosphorus (OP) pesticide exposure from diet by biological monitoring among Seattle, Washington, preschool children. Parents kept food diaries for 3 days before urine collection, and they distinguished organic and conventional foods based on label information. Children were then classified as having consumed either organic or conventional diets based on analysis of the diary data. Residential pesticide use was also recorded for each home. We collected 24-hr urine samples from 18 children with organic diets and 21 children with conventional diets and analyzed them for five OP pesticide metabolites. We found significantly higher median concentrations of total dimethyl alkylphosphate metabolites than total diethyl alkylphosphate metabolites (0.06 and 0.02 micro mol/L, respectively; p = 0.0001). The median total dimethyl metabolite concentration was approximately six times higher for children with conventional diets than for children with organic diets (0.17 and 0.03 micro mol/L; p = 0.0003); mean concentrations differed by a factor of nine (0.34 and 0.04 micro mol/L). We calculated dose estimates from urinary dimethyl metabolites and from agricultural pesticide use data, assuming that all exposure came from a single pesticide. The dose estimates suggest that consumption of organic fruits, vegetables, and juice can reduce children's exposure levels from above to below the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's current guidelines, thereby shifting exposures from a range of uncertain risk to a range of negligible risk. Consumption of organic produce appears to provide a relatively simple way for parents to reduce their children's exposure to OP pesticides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, there is increasing evidence and more widespread acceptance that the consumption of organic foods is likely to reduce exposure to pesticide residues( 21 , 23 , 24 ).”
In the citing paper
“This supports previous studies that have concluded that organic food consumption can reduce exposure to pesticide residues( 21 – 23 ).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children
National Research Council (1993) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/2126 · Cited by 863
Perceived Risks of Conventional and Organic Produce: Pesticides, Pathogens, and Natural Toxins
Williams, P. R. D., & Hammitt, J. K. (2001) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/0272-4332.212114 · Cited by 389
Percutaneous penetration of some pesticides and herbicides in man
FELDMANN, R. J., & Maibach, H. I. (1974) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0041-008x(74)90137-9 · Cited by 382
National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals
(2023) · doi:10.15620/cdc:133100 · Cited by 236
Biologically Based Pesticide Dose Estimates for Children in an Agricultural Community
Fenske, R. A., Kissel, J. C., Lu, C. A., Kalman, D. A., Simcox, N. J., Allen, E., & Keifer, M. (2000) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.00108515 · Cited by 161
Self-citationLu, C. A., Knutson, D. E., Fisker-Andersen, J., & Fenske, R. A. (2001) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.01109299 · Cited by 154
Self-citationFenske, R. A., Kedan, G., Lu, C. A., Fisker-Andersen, J., & Curl, C. L. (2002) · Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology · doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500197 · Cited by 114
Self-citationEnvironmental Epidemiology: Challenges and Opportunities
Pekkanen, J., & Pearce, N. E. (2001) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.011091 · Cited by 107
Guidelines for the study of dietary intakes of chemical contaminants.
(1985) · PubMed · Cited by 103
Moate, T. F., Lu, C. A., Fenske, R. A., Hahne, R. M. A., & Kalman, D. A. (1999) · Journal of Analytical Toxicology · doi:10.1093/jat/23.4.230 · Cited by 62
Self-citationLongitudinal investigation of dietary exposure to selected pesticides.
MacIntosh, D. L., Kabiru, C. W., & Ryan, P. B. (2001) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.01109145 · Cited by 58
Thomas, K., Sheldon, L. S., Pellizzari, E. D., Handy, R. W., Roberds, J. M., & Berry, M. R. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 40
Factors influencing total dietary exposures of young children
Akland, G. G., Pellizzari, E. D., Hu, Y., ROBERDS, M., Rohrer, C. A., Leckie, J. O., & Berry, M. R. (2000) · Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology · doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500129 · Cited by 38
Dietary exposure from pesticide application on farms in the Agricultural Health Pilot Study.
Melnyk, L. J., Berry, M. R., & Sheldon, L. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 28
Lu, C. A., Knutson, D. E., Fisker-Andersen, J., & Fenske, R. A. (2001) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.2307/3434700 · Cited by 28
Self-citationBiologically Based Pesticide Dose Estimates for Children in an Agricultural Community
Fenske, R. A., Kissel, J. C., Lu, C. A., et al. (2000) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.2307/3454612 · Cited by 16
Self-citationMr, B. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 15
(2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-9283-6_1000 · Cited by 12
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century
Reganold, J. P., & Wachter, J. M. (2016) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/nplants.2015.221 · Cited by 2,130
Barański, M., Średnicka-Tober, D., Volakakis, N., Seal, C., Sanderson, R., Stewart, G. B., Benbrook, C., Biavati, B., Markellou, E., Giotis, C., et al. (2014) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114514001366 · Cited by 684
“This supports previous studies that have concluded that organic food consumption can reduce exposure to pesticide residues (21–23) .”
Are Organic Foods Safer or Healthier Than Conventional Alternatives?: A Systematic Review
Smith-Spangler, C., Brandeau, M. L., Hunter, G. E., Bavinger, J. C., Pearson, M., Eschbach, P. J., Sundaram, V., Liu, H., Schirmer, P., Stave, C., et al. (2012) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-5-201209040-00007 · Cited by 602
Australians' organic food beliefs, demographics and values
Lea, E. J., & Worsley, A. F. (2005) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700510629797 · Cited by 496
Pesticides in the urban environment: A potential threat that knocks at the door
Meftaul, I. M., Venkateswarlu, K., Dharmarajan, R., Annamalai, P., & Megharaj, M. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134612 · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- Curl, C. L., Fenske, R. A., & Elgethun, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- ORCID
- Curl, Cynthia L
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-03-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 377-382
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- PMC
- PMC1241395
- OpenAlex
- W2069073623
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 18.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor, 5417 d)
- Locations
- Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U07/CCU102926)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P01ES009601)
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Keywords
- organophosphorus pesticides, dietary pesticide exposure, organic food, conventional food, preschool children, urinary metabolites, residential pesticide use, dose estimation, food diary
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Child, Preschool, Diet, Environmental Exposure, Female, Food Contamination, Fruit, Humans, Insecticides, Male, Organophosphorus Compounds, Urban Population, Vegetables, Food, Organic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review