Cited by 347Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Neuroendocrine Effects of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate in Rats

Open access
Austin, Maureen E, Kasturi, Badrinarayanan S, Barber, Matthew, Kannan, Kurunthachalam, MohanKumar, Puliyur S, MohanKumar, Sheba M J·2003·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) is a degradation product of sulfonyl-based fluorochemicals that are used extensively in industrial and household applications. Humans and wildlife are exposed to this class of compounds from several sources. Toxicity tests in rodents have raised concerns about potential developmental, reproductive, and systemic effects of PFOS. However, the effect of PFOS on the neuroendocrine system has not been investigated thus far. In this study, adult female rats were injected intraperitoneally with 0, 1, or 10 mg PFOS/kg body weight (BW) for 2 weeks. Food and water intake, BW, and estrous cycles were monitored daily. At the end of treatment, PFOS levels in tissues were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) interfaced with electrospray mass spectrometry. Changes in brain monoamines were measured by HPLC with electrochemical detection, and serum corticosterone and leptin were monitored using radioimmunoassay. Treatment with PFOS produced a dose-dependent accumulation of this chemical in various body tissues, including the brain. PFOS exposure decreased food intake and BW in a dose-dependent manner. Treatment with PFOS affected estrous cyclicity and increased serum corticosterone levels while decreasing serum leptin concentrations. PFOS treatment also increased norepinephrine concentrations in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. These results indicate that exposure to PFOS can affect the neuroendocrine system in rats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.6128

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PFOS accumulation in the hypothalamus was associated with increased concentrations of serum leptin in Austin et al. (2003).

    “Austin et al. (2003) found that PFOS accumulation in the hypothalamus was associated with increased concentrations of serum leptin”

    From A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances on the Brain and Behavior (2022) · cites this paper as Austin et al., 2003

    The “Accumulation of PFOS in tissues” section reports greater hypothalamic accumulation in rats given the high dose. But the “Serum leptin” section reports that the high dose markedly decreased serum leptin, from 10.5 ± 1.5 ng/mL in controls to 1.5 ± 0.5 ng/mL—not increased it. (LLM, conf=0.95)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Austin et al. (2003) reported the highest PFOS concentration in the hypothalamus (15,706 ng/g) and the lowest in the cortex (4,487 ng/g) after exposing female rats to 10 mg/kg/day via intraperitoneal injection for 2 weeks.

    “Austin et al. (2003) reported the highest concentration of PFOS in the hypothalamus (15,706 ng/g), and the lowest concentration in the cortex (4,487 ng/g), after exposing female rats to 10 mg/kg/day via intraperitoneal injection for 2 weeks.”

    From A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances on the Brain and Behavior (2022) · cites this paper as Austin et al., 2003

    The Animals section reports daily intraperitoneal injections of 10 mg/kg PFOS in adult female rats for 14 days. The Accumulation of PFOS in tissues section says the hypothalamus had the greatest accumulation among brain regions at the higher dose, but our copy does not show the claimed 15,706 or 4,487 ng/g values or establish that the cortex was lowest; the extracted Table 1 contains only its header. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies in a rodent model and human brain samples showed a similar pattern of brain distribution for PFOS, PFHxS, and PFHxA as was seen in polar bears.

    “Studies in a rodent model and human brain samples showed a similar pattern of distribution in the brain for PFOS, perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), and perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) as was seen in the polar bears.”

    From A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances on the Brain and Behavior (2022) · cites this paper as Austin et al., 2003

    The ‘Accumulation of PFOS in tissues’ section (page unavailable) reports PFOS in several brain regions of exposed rats, with greater accumulation in the hypothalamus at the higher dose. The paper does not report brain distributions of PFHxS or PFHxA, examine human brain samples, or compare its findings with polar bears. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both rodent and human brain studies reported brain-region-specific accumulation of PFAS, with increased exposure in the hypothalamus and decreased exposure in the cortex.

    “both studies reported brain-region-specific accumulation, demonstrating increased exposure in the hypothalamus and decreased exposure in the cortex (Austin et al., 2003; Di Nisio et al., 2022).”

    From A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances on the Brain and Behavior (2022) · cites this paper as Austin et al., 2003

    The 'Accumulation of PFOS in tissues' section reports brain-region-specific accumulation in rats: at the higher dose, hypothalamic PFOS was at least three times higher than in other brain areas. It does not specifically report decreased accumulation in the cortex; it also studies rats, not humans. This verdict addresses Austin et al. (2003) only, not the other citation. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Exposure to PFAS, primarily PFOS and PFOA, can lead to decreased food consumption and decreased weight gain in adult animals.

    “exposure to PFAS, primarily PFOS and PFOA, can lead to decreased food consumption and decreased weight gain in adult animals”

    From A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances on the Brain and Behavior (2022) · cites this paper as Austin et al., 2003

    The Abstract reports that PFOS exposure decreased food intake and body weight in adult female rats, and the Food intake section reports a significant decrease at the high dose. The paper did not test PFOA; it says only that PFOA is thought to have effects similar to PFOS. Thus it supports the claim for PFOS in adult rats, but not for PFOA. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 347

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Petrusz P, Merchenthaler I. 1992. The corticotropin-releasing factor system. In: Neuroendocrinology (Nemeroff CB, ed). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 129-184.
  2. Ramirez VD, Feder HH, Sawyer CH. 1984. The role of brain cate- cholamines in the regulation of LH secretion: a critical inquiry. In: Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, vol. 8 (Martini L, Ganong WF, eds). New York: Raven Press, 27-84.

Authors
Austin, M. E., Kasturi, B. S., Barber, M., Kannan, K., MohanKumar, P. S., & MohanKumar, S. M. J.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
2003-09-01
Volume
111
Issue
12
Pages
1485-1489
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W2022879961
Cited by
347
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 17
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Michigan State University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • College of Engineering, Michigan State University
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG005980, AG05980)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Keywords
PFOS, neuroendocrine toxicity, fluorochemicals, brain monoamines, norepinephrine, paraventricular nucleus, corticosterone, leptin, estrous cyclicity, dietary intake, tissue accumulation, dose-dependent effects
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Chemistry, Corticosterone, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Environmental Pollutants, Feeding Behavior, Female, Fluorocarbons, Injections, Intraperitoneal, Neurosecretory Systems, Norepinephrine, Tissue Distribution, Biogenic Monoamines, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Leptin, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review